Taking Risk: Early Results From Teaching Hospitals' Participation in the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation Bundled Payments for Care Improvement Initiative.

Acad Med

C. Kivlahan is senior director, Health Care Affairs, Association of American Medical Colleges, Washington, DC. J.M. Orlowski is chief health care officer, Association of American Medical Colleges, Washington, DC. J. Pearce is principal, Singletrack Analytics, Woodbury, New Jersey. J. Walradt is senior payment reform specialist, Alternative Payment, Health Care Affairs, Association of American Medical Colleges, Washington, DC. M. Baker is research analyst, Health Care Affairs, Association of American Medical Colleges, Washington, DC. D.G. Kirch is president and chief executive officer, Association of American Medical Colleges, Washington, DC.

Published: July 2016

The authors describe observations from the 27 teaching hospitals constituting the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) cohort in the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation (CMMI) Bundled Payments for Care Improvement (BPCI) initiative. CMMI introduced BPCI in August 2011 and selected the first set of participants in January 2013. BPCI participants enter into Medicare payment arrangements for episodes of care for which they take financial risk. The first round of participants entered risk agreements on October 1, 2013 and January 1, 2014. In April 2014, CMMI selected additional participants who started taking financial risk in 2015. Selected episodes include congestive heart failure (CHF), major joint replacement (MJR), and cardiac valve surgery. The AAMC cohort of participating hospitals selected clinical conditions on the basis of patient volume, opportunity to impact savings and quality, organizational and clinical team readiness, and prior process improvement experience. Early financial results suggest that focused attention to postacute care utilization and outcomes, rapid changes in care processes, program pricing rules, and team composition drove savings and losses. The first cohort of participants generated savings in MJR, CHF, and cardiac valve episodes; losses were experienced in stroke, percutaneous coronary intervention, and spine surgery. Although about one-quarter of U.S. teaching hospitals are participating in BPCI, the proliferation of existing and new payment models, as well as the 2015 announcement to increasingly pay providers according to value, mandates close scrutiny of program outcomes. The authors conclude by proposing additional opportunities for research related to alternative payment models.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000001121DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

center medicare
8
medicare medicaid
8
medicaid innovation
8
bundled payments
8
payments care
8
care improvement
8
teaching hospitals
8
aamc cohort
8
financial risk
8
cardiac valve
8

Similar Publications

Purpose: While previous research has highlighted treatment delay inequities in early-stage breast cancer and identified potential contributing factors, there is limited research on disparities in treatment delays for metastatic breast cancer (MBC). This study investigates these disparities in MBC treatment initiation, aiming to identify key factors crucial for improving timely access to care.

Method: Nationwide Flatiron Health electronic health records-derived deidentified database, including females aged 18+ diagnosed with either De novo or relapsed MBC in the U.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) coverage with evidence development (CED) program provides coverage for items and services not meeting Medicare's "reasonable and necessary" standard while requiring participation in clinical studies. As additional evidence is available, CMS may reconsider CED decisions. Of twenty-six items and services in the CED program since its 2005 inception, CMS has reconsidered coverage for ten (38 percent).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Black and Hispanic patients who receive care from Black and Hispanic physicians have greater use of preventive care. However, receiving care from racially concordant physicians requires that such physicians are included in private insurance plan networks. Using data from 2019, we examined the extent to which racially concordant physicians are available in the Medicare Advantage (MA) program, which disproportionately enrolls Black and Hispanic Medicare beneficiaries, by linking MA physician networks to physician race and ethnicity to measure the diversity of in-network physicians.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

In 2020, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services reintroduced Alzheimer's disease and related dementias to its risk-adjustment payment model for Medicare Advantage (MA) plans. Using 2017-20 data for 100 percent of community-dwelling beneficiaries enrolled in Medicare, we evaluated how the reintroduction of dementia to the risk-adjustment model affected rates of new (incident) dementia diagnoses among beneficiaries enrolled in MA relative to those enrolled in traditional Medicare. In response to the payment change, annual incident dementia diagnosis rates in MA increased by 11.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Medicare Advantage (MA) plans report diagnoses more completely than they are reported in traditional Medicare. As a result, payment to MA plans is greater than it would be if coding patterns were identical in the two sectors. The Medicare Payment Advisory Commission estimates that the overpayment to MA attributable to differential coding was $50 billion in 2024.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!