By proposing a moratorium on human germ line editing using CRISPR, scientists have entered an all‐or‐nothing wager with public opinion. A better approach would be to convene a rational and broad discussion of the fair and ethical application and regulation of gene editing and other new technologies. [Image: see text]
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4772984 | PMC |
| http://dx.doi.org/10.15252/embr.201541935 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
gene editing
8
bet won't"
4
won't" science-society
4
science-society wager
4
wager gene
4
editing techniques
4
techniques proposing
4
proposing moratorium
4
moratorium human
4
human germ
4
Similar Publications
Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!