A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Photographic Objective Alterations for Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Diagnosis. | LitMetric

Objective: Diagnosis of laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) in clinical practice is generally made subjectively based on history, symptoms, and endoscopic assessment. This study presents the diagnostic role of the digital photographic assessment of the laryngopharyngeal region for LPR.

Methods: Seventy-two patients with LPR symptoms and 35 healthy volunteers were evaluated using the Reflux Finding Scores (RFS) and the Reflux Symptom Index (RSI). The results of these scales were recorded in 72 patients representing group 1 with LPR diagnosis; they returned after 1 and 2 months of treatment as groups 2 and 3, respectively. Thirty-five volunteers represented group 4. Laryngopharyngeal regions of all subjects were examined and photographed endoscopically. Red, green, and blue (RGB) values of particular oropharyngeal and laryngeal points were measured.

Results: RSI and RFS values of group 1 were significantly different from the other three groups, as were the scores of group 2; however, the comparison of the RSI and RFS values of groups 3 and 4 did not reveal a statistically significant difference. Laryngopharyngeal RGB values also duplicated statistical significance as above.

Conclusion: Measurement of RGB values can be a cheap and easy-to-use method to quickly provide objective and corroborative information to help in the diagnosis of LPR in conjunction with subjective methods.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2015.12.021DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

rgb values
12
laryngopharyngeal reflux
8
rsi rfs
8
rfs values
8
laryngopharyngeal
5
values
5
photographic objective
4
objective alterations
4
alterations laryngopharyngeal
4
reflux
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!