INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE IN PATIENTS WITH DIABETIC MACULAR EDEMA TREATED WITH DEXAMETHASONE INTRAVITREAL IMPLANT IN THE 3-YEAR MEAD STUDY.

Retina

*Midwest Eye Institute, Indianapolis, Indiana; †Kaplan Medical Center, Rehovot, Israel; ‡Peregrine Eye and Laser Institute, Makati, Philippines; §Fondazione GB Bietti-IRCCS, Rome, Italy; ¶Ocular Surgery Center, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil; **Allergan plc, Irvine, California; ††Avanir Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Aliso Viejo, California; and ‡‡Jules Stein Eye Institute, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California.

Published: June 2016

AI Article Synopsis

Article Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the occurrence, management, and clinical significance of increases in intraocular pressure (IOP) in patients with diabetic macular edema treated with dexamethasone intravitreal implant (DEX implant).

Methods: Randomized, multicenter, 3-year, Phase III study. Patients (N = 1,048) with diabetic macular edema were randomized to DEX implant 0.7-mg, DEX implant 0.35-mg, or sham procedure with retreatment allowed at ≥6-month intervals (seven injections maximum).

Results: In the DEX implant 0.7-mg, DEX implant 0.35-mg, and sham groups, respectively, ≥10-mmHg IOP increases from baseline occurred in 27.7%, 24.8%, and 3.7% of patients, and their frequency did not increase with repeat injections. IOP-lowering medication was used by 41.5%, 37.6%, and 9.1% of patients. Only one patient (0.3%) in each DEX implant group had filtering surgery to manage a steroid-induced IOP increase. Among DEX implant 0.7-mg-treated patients with and without a ≥10-mmHg IOP increase, 21.9% (21 of 96) and 22.4% (57 of 255), respectively, achieved ≥15-letter best-corrected visual acuity gain at the end of the study, and mean average change in central retinal thickness from baseline was -127 μm and -106 μm, respectively.

Conclusion: DEX implant demonstrated clear benefit of treatment despite increases in IOP. Sequential implants had no cumulative effect on IOP.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0000000000001004DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

dex implant
28
diabetic macular
12
macular edema
12
implant
9
intraocular pressure
8
patients diabetic
8
edema treated
8
treated dexamethasone
8
dexamethasone intravitreal
8
intravitreal implant
8

Similar Publications

Antibacterial and osteogenic gain strategy on titanium surfaces for preventing implant-related infections.

Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces

December 2024

College of Chemical Engineering, Xinjiang Normal University, 102 Xinyi Road, Urumqi 830054, P.R. China. Electronic address:

Infection and insufficient osseointegration are the primary factors leading to the failure of titanium-based implants. Surface coating modifications that combine both antibacterial and osteogenic properties are commonly employed strategies. However, the challenge of achieving rapid antibacterial action and consistent osteogenesis with these coatings remains unresolved.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of dexamethasone implantation in the supraciliary (SC) space, a novel and potential effective implantation site, compared to intravitreal (IV) application.

Methods: This prospective study included 39 eyes of 38 patients with macular oedema (ME) who underwent SC and IV dexamethasone implantation (SC-DEX and IV-DEX). Patients were randomly assigned to treatment groups and followed for 3 months.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background/objective: Retinal vein occlusion (RVO) is a common, sight-threatening vascular disorder affecting individuals of all ages, with incidence increasing with age. Due to its complex, multifactorial nature, treating RVO remains a clinical challenge. Currently, treatment strategies include laser photocoagulation (especially for branch RVO), anti-VEGF therapies, and intravitreal corticosteroids.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

To investigate the protective mechanism of dexmedetomidine (DEX) on adipose-derived stromal cells (ADSCs) under oxidative stress model and its promotion effect on the retention rate of adipose granule transplantation by and experiments. The experiment was divided into control group, model group (ADSCs + HO+normal serum), DEX group (ADSCs + H0+DEX drug-containing serum), autophagy agonist group (ADSCs + HO+rapamycin (RAP)+normal serum), RAP + DEX group (ADSCs + HO+normal serum), RAP + DEX drug-containing serum), autophagy inhibitor group (ADSCs + HO+chloroquine (CQ)+normal serum), CQ + DEX group (ADSCs + HO+CQ + DEX drug-containing serum). HO-1, GSH-PX, SOD and CAT in ADSCs under oxidative stress model were measured.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Continuous glucose monitors have revolutionized diabetes management, yet such devices are limited by their cost, invasiveness, and stability. Microneedle (MN) arrays could offer improved comfort compared to invasive implanted or mm-sized needle devices, but such arrays are hampered by complex fabrication processes, limited mechanical and sensor stability, and/or cytotoxicity concerns. This work demonstrates the first crosslinked hydrogel microneedle-bioelectroenzymatic sensor arrays capable of biomarker extraction and robust transdermal continuous monitoring in artificial interstitial fluid for 10 days.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!