A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

A diversity of peri-implant mucosal thickness by site. | LitMetric

A diversity of peri-implant mucosal thickness by site.

Clin Oral Implants Res

Department of Oral Implantology and Regenerative Dental Medicine, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.

Published: February 2017

Objectives: The objective of this study was to examine peri-implant mucosal thickness at different sites of peri-implant crevice around 70 implants placed in 35 patients.

Material And Methods: The peri-implant mucosal thickness was defined as distance of the peri-implant mucosal margin and the coronal edge of bone/implant contact and measured using the cast models and dental radiography.

Results: The overall mean peri-implant mucosal thickness was 3.6 ± 1.4 mm, wherein maxillary anterior implants, maxillary posterior implants and mandibular posterior implants had significantly different dimensions of median thickness of 4.25, 3.75 and 3.0 mm, respectively. Furthermore, the mesial and distal sites of those positioned implants measured unevenness in the thickness especially in the maxillary posterior region with statistical significance.

Conclusion: The proposed methodology to evaluate peri-implant mucosal thickness measured with a big variation from overall 3.6 mm with a big variation from 1.6 to 7.0 mm in healthy volunteers. And significant difference was found in the depth among the three regions and, statistically, dispersion of individual peri-implant mucosal thickness resulted in lack of consistency. Although dental implants have been well developed, predictable and prevailing prosthetics, onset of peri-implantitis might be inevitable in some cases. Therefore, establishment of a standardized dimensional diagnosis of peri-implant tissues followed by pathologic ascertainment could be taken into account for the prevention or curing of peri-implantitis.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/clr.12778DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

peri-implant mucosal
28
mucosal thickness
24
thickness
8
peri-implant
8
maxillary posterior
8
posterior implants
8
big variation
8
mucosal
7
implants
6
diversity peri-implant
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!