A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Evaluation of Time-Phase Effect on 18F-FDG PET/CT Delineation Methods for Treatment Planning of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma. | LitMetric

Evaluation of Time-Phase Effect on 18F-FDG PET/CT Delineation Methods for Treatment Planning of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma.

Clin Nucl Med

From the *Laboratory for Advanced Interdisciplinary Research, Institutes of Translational Medicine, †Institutes of Intelligent and Molecular Imaging, ‡Division of PET/CT, Department of Radiology, and §Department of Radiation Oncology, the First Affiliated Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.

Published: May 2016

Purpose: Tumor boundary delineation using F-FDG PET/CT is a promising tool for radiotherapy applications, but no consensus has been established regarding the optimal delineation method. Time-phase variability of F-FDG PET/CT imaging frequently affects metabolically active volumes and treatment planning for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). This study aimed to evaluate the time-phase robustness of 8 methods commonly used for tumor volume delineation in NPC.

Patients And Methods: Twenty patients with biopsy-proven NPC were included and underwent multiple time-phase F-FDG PET/CT imaging. Gross tumor volumes (GTVs), absolute SUV, gradient-based watershed segmentation (GTV-GWT), and anatomic biologic contouring (GTV-ABC) values were determined. The volume of overlap between GTV-CT and the 8 PET-based GTVs was enclosed and the overlap fraction (OF-CT) calculated. Color matrix was used to semiquantify the time-phase differences. Gross tumor volume values obtained with different methods were recorded and compared using paired t test. Time-phase differences of GTVs and SUVmax were compared among groups by analysis of variance with Tukey honest significance tests. The coefficients of variation were computed to assess intrapatient time-phase variability. Similarity coefficient was calculated to evaluate similarity.

Results: Differences were observed between GTVs obtained at different time points using various delineation procedures. Nonsignificantly higher percentages were obtained for GTV-GWT (88.17%) and GTV-ABC (86.98%) compared with other methods, showing their robustness. GTV-40% (0.81-0.88) and GTV-ABC (0.82-0.88) indicated higher similarity with GTV-MRI than the other methods.

Conclusions: PET/CT-based GTV-ABC between 35 and 55 minutes should be the first choice for NPC treatment planning.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/RLU.0000000000001161DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

treatment planning
12
f-fdg pet/ct
12
planning nasopharyngeal
8
nasopharyngeal carcinoma
8
time-phase variability
8
pet/ct imaging
8
tumor volume
8
gross tumor
8
time-phase differences
8
time-phase
6

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!