Purpose: An interlaboratory comparison of radiation dosimetry was conducted to determine the accuracy of doses being used experimentally for animal exposures within a large multi-institutional research project. The background and approach to this effort are described and discussed in terms of basic findings, problems and solutions.

Methods: Dosimetry tests were carried out utilizing optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) dosimeters embedded midline into mouse carcasses and thermal luminescence dosimeters (TLD) embedded midline into acrylic phantoms.

Results: The effort demonstrated that the majority (4/7) of the laboratories was able to deliver sufficiently accurate exposures having maximum dosing errors of ≤5%. Comparable rates of 'dosimetric compliance' were noted between OSL- and TLD-based tests. Data analysis showed a highly linear relationship between 'measured' and 'target' doses, with errors falling largely between 0 and 20%. Outliers were most notable for OSL-based tests, while multiple tests by 'non-compliant' laboratories using orthovoltage X-rays contributed heavily to the wide variation in dosing errors.

Conclusions: For the dosimetrically non-compliant laboratories, the relatively high rates of dosing errors were problematic, potentially compromising the quality of ongoing radiobiological research. This dosimetry effort proved to be instructive in establishing rigorous reviews of basic dosimetry protocols ensuring that dosing errors were minimized.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4976771PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/09553002.2015.1106024DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

dosing errors
12
interlaboratory comparison
8
embedded midline
8
dosimetry
5
comparison dosimetry
4
dosimetry multi-institutional
4
multi-institutional radiobiological
4
radiobiological project
4
project observations
4
observations problems
4

Similar Publications

Article Synopsis
  • A study in Jordan found a 2.4% prevalence of vaccine administration errors (VAEs) during the COVID-19 vaccination campaign, with various types of errors identified, including timing and dosing mistakes.
  • Most errors were minor or moderate, and significant contributing factors included healthcare provider issues and higher error rates during peak vaccination times and in the Southern region.
  • The findings highlight the need for more research and strategies to address VAEs to ensure effective immunization and patient safety.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

We assessed the effect of beam size on plan robustness for intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) of head and neck cancer (HNC) and compared the plan quality including robustness with that of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). IMPT plans were generated for six HNC patients using six beam sizes (air-sigma 3-17 mm at isocenter for a 70-230 MeV) and two optimization methods for planning target volume-based non-robust optimization (NRO) and clinical target volume (CTV)-based robust optimization (RO). Worst-case dosimetric parameters and plan robustness for CTV and organs-at-risk (OARs) were assessed under different scenarios, assuming a ± 1-5 mm setup error and a ± 3% range error.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Recent evidence suggests that cannabis can impair simple auditory processes, and these alterations might be due to cannabinoid agonism. The effect of cannabinoid agonism on relatively complex processes such as auditory discrimination is unknown. The goal of this study was to examine the impact of WIN 55,212-2, a CB1 receptor and CB2 receptor agonism, on auditory discrimination using a go/no-go task.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Treatment of neoplasic lung nodules with ground glass opacities (GGO) faces two primary challenges. First, the standard practice of treating GGOs as solid nodules, which effectively controls the tumor locally, but might increase associated toxicities. The second is the potential for dose calculation errors related to increased heterogeneity.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Prediction of lacosamide concentrations to support dose optimization during pregnancy.

Epilepsia

December 2024

Department of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, College of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.

Objective: We aimed to quantify and predict lacosamide exposure during pregnancy by developing a pregnancy physiologically-based pharmacokinetic model, allowing the prediction of potential dose increases to support maintaining a patient's preconception lacosamide concentrations.

Methods: Models for nonpregnant adults and pregnant female patients were constructed using physiochemical and pharmacological parameters identified from literature review. Evaluation of plasma concentration data from human males was digitized from the literature.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!