Objective: Recent literature reports that radical hysterectomy followed by adjuvant radiotherapy has comparable progression-free survival and overall survival compared to radical radiotherapy for International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IIB cervical cancer. Now, we evaluate the cost-effectiveness (CE) of these two treatment regimens.

Primary And Secondary Outcome Measures: A decision-tree model was constructed comparing CE between treatment arms using the published studies for overall survival rates and treatment-related toxicity rates for 5 years. The cost data were obtained from the hospital system of the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University. Effectiveness was measured as quality-adjusted life year (QALY). Treatment arms were compared with regard to costs and life expectancy using incremental CE ratio, and the results were presented using costs per QALY.

Results: The mean cost was $10,872 for radical hysterectomy followed by adjuvant radiotherapy versus $5,702 for radical radiotherapy. The incremental CE ratio for surgery-based treatment compared to radiotherapy-based treatment was -$76,453 per QALY.

Conclusion: Radical radiotherapy would be a cost-effective method for FIGO stage IIB cervical cancer and would be favored in settings where resources are limited.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4727512PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OTT.S90798DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

radical radiotherapy
16
radical hysterectomy
12
hysterectomy adjuvant
12
adjuvant radiotherapy
12
stage iib
12
iib cervical
12
cervical cancer
12
radiotherapy versus
8
figo stage
8
treatment arms
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!