Background: In rectal cancer surgery, low anterior resection and abdominoperineal resection have equivocal impact on overall quality of life. A rectal cancer decision aid was developed to help patients weigh features of options and share their preference.
Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of a patient decision aid for mid to low rectal cancer surgery on the patients' choice and decision-making process.
Design: A before-and-after study was conducted. Baseline data collection occurred after surgeon confirmation of eligibility at the first consultation. Patients used the patient decision aid at home (online and/or paper-based formats) and completed post questionnaires.
Setting: This study was conducted at an academic hospital referral center.
Patients: Adults who had rectal cancer at a maximum of 10 cm proximal to the anal verge and were amenable to surgical resection were considered. Those with preexisting stoma and those only receiving abdominoperineal resection for technical reasons were excluded from the study.
Intervention: Patient with rectal cancer were provided with a decision aid.
Main Outcome Measures: The primary outcomes measured were decisional conflict, knowledge, and preference for a surgical option.
Results: Of 136 patients newly diagnosed with rectal cancer over 13 months, 44 (32.4%) were eligible, 36 (81.9%) of the eligible patients consented to participate, and 32 (88.9%) patients completed the study. The mean age of participants was 61.9 ± 9.7 years and tumor location was on average 7.3 ± 2.1 cm above the anal verge. Patients had poor baseline knowledge (52.5%), and their knowledge improved by 37.5% (p < 0.0001) after they used the patient decision aid. Decisional conflict was reduced by 24.2% (p = 0.0001). At baseline, no patients preferred a permanent stoma, and after decision aid exposure, 2 patients (7.1%) preferred permanent stoma. Over 96% of participants would recommend the patient decision aid to others.
Limitations: This study was limited by the lack of control for potential confounders and potential response bias.
Conclusions: The patient decision aid reduced decisional conflict and improved patient knowledge. Participants would recommend it to other patients with rectal cancer.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000000528 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Risk factors for anastomotic leakage in rectal cancer surgery reflecting current practices.
Surg Today
January 2025
Department of Surgery, Yokohama City University Hospital, 3-9, Fukuura, Kanazawa-Ku, Yokohama, Kanagawa, 236-0004, Japan.
Purpose: In recent years, major advancements have been made in rectal cancer surgery with the introduction of new techniques such as robotic surgery and indocyanine green fluorescence imaging (ICG-FI). This study aimed to evaluate the comprehensive risk factors for anastomotic leakage (AL) following rectal cancer surgery, incorporating recently introduced techniques and other existing factors, to reflect current practices.
Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted of 304 patients who underwent either robotic or laparoscopic anterior resection between January 2019 and December 2023.
Long-Term Effects of Ozone Treatment in Patients with Persistent Numbness and Tingling Secondary to Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy. A Retrospective Study.
Integr Cancer Ther
January 2025
University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria (ULPGC), Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain.
Background: Numbness and tingling secondary to chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) are frequent side effects that limit chemotherapy treatment and quality of life. Successful treatments for CIPN are limited. This preliminary report shows the potential long-term effects of ozone treatment in the management of persistent numbness and tingling secondary to CIPN.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFLocal excision for T1 rectal cancer: A population-based study of practice patterns and oncological outcomes.
Colorectal Dis
January 2025
Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Aim: Local excision (LE) for T1 rectal cancer may be recommended in those with low-risk disease, while resection is typically recommended in those with a high risk of luminal recurrence or lymph node metastasis. The aim of this work was to compare survival between resection and LE.
Method: This was a population-based retrospective cohort study set in the Canadian province of Ontario.
Surgical Emergencies in Rectal Cancer: A Narrative Review.
J Clin Med
December 2024
General Surgery Department, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, 27100 Pavia, Italy.
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most diagnosed cancer worldwide and the second most common cause of cancer death. About 20% of patients diagnosed with rectal cancer present with emergency symptoms. Typical symptoms include acute bleeding, obstruction, and perforation.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFLocal Recurrence of Premalignant and Early Malignant Rectal Polyps Treated by TEM-A Single-Center Experience.
J Clin Med
December 2024
Department of Surgery, Rabin Medical Center-Hasharon Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Petach Tikva 49100, Israel.
Transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) is a minimally invasive approach for excising rectal polyps, particularly those with high-grade dysplasia (HGD) or early-stage rectal cancer (T1). This study aimed to evaluate the recurrence risk and its associated factors in patients treated with TEM for HGD and T1 rectal tumors. A retrospective review was conducted on 79 patients who underwent TEM for rectal lesions at Rabin Medical Center-Hasharon Hospital from 2005 to 2019.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWant AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!