AI Article Synopsis

  • The organ shortage has led to the increased use of marginal organs, prompting the establishment of the Eurotransplant Donor-Risk-Index (ET-DRI) to evaluate liver transplant outcomes.
  • A study analyzed long-term graft survival (GS) in 1,767 adult primary liver transplants, finding the mean ET-DRI was 1.63 and that long-term GS was significantly influenced by ET-DRI categories, particularly in patients with alcohol-related issues, cholestatic/autoimmune diseases, and HCV.
  • Multivariate analysis indicated that higher ET-DRI values (especially >2) were negative predictors for patients with specific labMELD categories, suggesting that higher-risk organs should be cautiously allocated to certain

Article Abstract

The organ shortage has led to increased use of marginal organs. The Eurotransplant Donor-Risk-Index (ET-DRI) was established to estimate outcome after Liver Transplantation (LT). Currently, data on impact of ET-DRI on long-term outcome for different indications and recipient conditions are missing. Retrospective, single-center analysis of long-term graft survival (GS) of 1767 adult primary LTs according to indication, labMELDcategory (1: ≤18; 2: >18-25; 3: >25-35; 4: >35), and ET-DRI. Mean ET-DRI in our cohort was 1.63 (±0.43). One-, 10, and 15-yr GS was 83.5%, 63.3%, and 54.8%. Long-term GS was significantly influenced by ET-DRI. Accordingly, four ET-DRI categories were defined and analyzed with respect to underlying disease. Significant impact of these categories was observed for: Alcohol, cholestatic/autoimmune diseases (CD/AIH), and HCV, but not for HCC, HBV, cryptogenic cirrhosis, and acute liver failure. labMELD categories showed no significant influence on graft, but on patient survival. Matching ET-DRI categories with labMELD revealed significant differences in long-term GS for labMELDcategories 1, 2, and 3, but not 4. In multivariate analysis, HCV combined with ET-DRI > 2 and labMELDcategory 3 combined with ET-DRI > 2 emerged as negative predictors. To achieve excellent long-term graft survival, higher risk organs (ET-DRI > 1.4) should be used restrictively for patients with CD/AIH or HCV. Organs with ET-DRI > 2 should be avoided in patients with a labMELD of >25-35.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ctr.12714DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

et-dri
11
eurotransplant donor-risk-index
8
long-term outcome
8
outcome liver
8
liver transplantation
8
long-term graft
8
graft survival
8
et-dri et-dri
8
et-dri categories
8
cd/aih hcv
8

Similar Publications

BACKGROUND Because of the massive organ shortage worldwide, marginal organs are increasingly being considered. The aim of this study was to present a comprehensive analysis of donor-related factors clinically supposed to influence the outcome after liver transplantation. This study from a single center in Germany aimed to evaluate postoperative outcomes in 415 patients following liver transplantation using extended donor criteria.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Validation of risk scores for allograft failure after liver transplantation in Germany: a retrospective cohort analysis.

Hepatol Commun

January 2023

Department of Surgery, Experimental Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte|Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health.

A growing number of clinical risk scores have been proposed to predict allograft failure after liver transplantation. However, validation of currently available scores in the Eurotransplant region is still lacking. We aimed to analyze all clinically relevant donor and recipient risk scores on a large German liver transplantation data set and performed a retrospective cohort analysis of liver transplantations performed at the Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin from January 2007 until December 2021 with organs from donation after brain death.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

This study aimed to identify cutoff values for donor risk index (DRI), Eurotransplant (ET)-DRI, and balance of risk (BAR) scores that predict the risk of liver graft loss. MEDLINE and Web of Science databases were searched systematically and unrestrictedly. Graft loss odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were assessed by meta-analyses using Mantel-Haenszel tests with a random-effects model.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: In an attempt to further improve liver allograft utilization and outcome in orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT), a variety of clinical scoring systems have been developed. Here we aimed to comparatively investigate the association of the Balance-of-Risk (BAR), Survival-Outcomes-Following-Liver-Transplant (SOFT), Preallocation-Survival-Outcomes-Following-Liver-Transplant (pSOFT), Donor-Risk-Index (DRI), and the Eurotransplant-Donor-Risk-Index (ET-DRI) scores with short- and long-term outcome following OLT.

Methods: We included 338 consecutive patients, who underwent OLT in our institution between May 2010 and November 2017.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: several indicators are available to assess liver graft survival, including the American DRI and the European ET-DRI. However, there are significant differences between transplant programs of different countries, and the previously mentioned indicators might be not valid in our setting.

Objectives: the aim of the study was to describe a new national liver graft risk indicator based on the results obtained from the Registro Español de Trasplante Hepático (RETH) and to validate the DRI and ET-DRI indicators.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!