Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Background: Nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) is a recognized treatment for selected patients with breast cancer (BC). Our study aimed to analyze 7 years' experience in NSM and breast reconstruction for patients with preoperative diagnosis of non-invasive BC.
Patients And Methods: All NSMs with breast reconstruction, performed between January 2007 and December 2013 in patients with preoperative diagnosis of non-invasive BC, were considered.
Results: Thirty-five NSMs were performed, 23 cases confirming the diagnosis of non-invasive BC, and in 12 patients it also resulted in findings of an invasive component. Patients were stratified into two groups: breast reconstruction was performed i) with silicone definitive implant, ii) with a temporary breast tissue expander. An invasive component at the postoperative histological examination was significantly associated with tissue expander reconstruction (p=0.03).
Conclusion: In selected cases, NSM is a valid and safe procedure. Further critical evaluations are required for more evidence on this argument.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!