Objectives: To analyse operative outcomes and mid-term results following isolated aortic valve replacement (AVR) in patients with low-flow low-gradient severe aortic stenosis (LFLG AS) compared with normal flow high-gradient aortic stenosis (NFHG AS).
Methods: A retrospective analysis of data for all isolated AVRs performed for AS at our centre in the last 17 years (n = 846). Two groups were identified: LFLG AS (n = 198, 23%) [subdivided into: True LFLG AS (n = 66, 33%) and paradoxical LFLG AS (n = 132, 67%)] and NFHG AS (n = 648, 77%). Follow-up was done by clinical visits and telephone interviews. The mean follow-up was 5.8 ± 4.2 years.
Results: The mean age was 71.5 ± 9.7 years in the LFLG AS group and 68.7 ± 10.8 years in the NFHG group (P = 0.01). The LFLG AS group had a mean gradient 31.2 ± 7.4 mmHg compared with 59.1 ± 16.6 mmHg in the NFHG group (P = 0.001). Diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, previous coronary disease, peripheral vascular disease, atrial fibrillation and pulmonary hypertension were significantly more frequent in the LFLG AS patients (P < 0.01). The in-hospital mortality rate was 2% in the LFLG and 1% in the NFHG group, P = 0.13. One- and 5-year mortality rates were significantly higher in the LFLG group (13 and 28 vs 4 and 16% in the NFHG, respectively, P = 0.001). Patients with true LFLG AS also had a significantly higher long-term mortality than those with paradoxical LFLG AS (27 vs 6% at 1 year and 42 vs 20% at 5 years, P < 0.05).
Conclusions: AVR in patients with LFLG AS is associated with similar surgical mortality but increased mid-term mortality compared with NFHG AS. Patients with true LFLG AS have the worst outcomes. Surgery should still be offered for LFLG AS on prognostic grounds and for symptomatic benefit among survivors.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezv449 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
Outcomes and Predictors of Different Flow-Gradient Patterns of Aortic Stenosis Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.
Am J Cardiol
January 2025
Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart, Vascular and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA. Electronic address:
This study sought to explore the clinical factors associated with classical low-flow low-gradient (C-LFLG) and normal-flow low-gradient (NFLG) aortic stenosis (AS) compared to high-gradient (HG) AS. We also compared clinical and echocardiographic outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) across flow-gradient patterns. Patients with C-LFLG AS have a higher mortality rate after TAVR than those with HG AS.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEffects of aortic valve calcification on transcatheter aortic valve replacement for low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis.
Cardiovasc Revasc Med
January 2025
Mount Sinai Fuster Heart Hospital, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA. Electronic address:
Background: Patients with low-flow, low-gradient (LFLG) aortic stenosis (AS) have precarious hemodynamics and are a fragile population for intervention. Quantification of aortic valve calcification (AVC) severity is a critical component of the evaluation for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR); this study aims to further clarify its utility for risk stratification in LFLG AS.
Methods: This retrospective study evaluated 467 patients with LFLG AS undergoing TAVR at a large quaternary-care hospital from January 2019 to December 2021.
Reevaluating Normal-Flow Low-Gradient Severe Aortic Stenosis: Clinical Phenotypes and Outcomes in Severe Aortic Stenosis Among TAVR Patients.
J Am Soc Echocardiogr
January 2025
Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.
Background: Aortic stenosis (AS) is a complex condition with various hemodynamic subtypes, each with distinct clinical profiles and outcomes. This study aimed to assess the characteristics and outcomes of different AS phenotypes based on flow and gradient patterns.
Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, we included 930 patients who underwent transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) for severe symptomatic AS at Mayo Clinic sites from 2012-2017.
Low-Gradient Severe Aortic Stenosis: Insights From the CURRENT AS Registry-2.
JACC Cardiovasc Interv
November 2024
Department of Cardiology, Hirakata Kohsai Hospital, Hirakata, Japan. Electronic address:
Background: Low-gradient (LG) aortic stenosis (AS) has not been fully characterized compared with high-gradient (HG) AS in terms of cardiac damage, frailty, aortic valve calcification, and clinical outcomes.
Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the clinical characteristics and outcomes between each hemodynamic type of LG AS and HG AS.
Methods: The current study included 3,363 patients in the CURRENT AS (Contemporary outcomes after sURgery and medical tREatmeNT in patients with severe Aortic Stenosis) Registry-2 after excluding patients without indexed stroke volume or left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) data.
Pulmonary hypertension as a prognostic marker in low-flow low-gradient aortic stenosis: Insights from invasive hemodynamics and post-TAVR outcomes.
Int J Cardiol
February 2025
Division of Adult Cardiology, National Heart Center, The Royal Hospital, Muscat, Oman; Ministry of Health, Muscat, Oman.
Introduction: Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a common and significant comorbidity in patients with low-flow low-gradient (LF-LG) aortic stenosis, impacting prognosis after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Non-invasive tools often fail to capture PH's full clinical impact due to inherent limitations. This study evaluates the prognostic significance of PH measured invasively and explores its implications on post-TAVR outcomes.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWant AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!