Study Design: A prospective, randomized, controlled, parallel, single-blinded noninferiority multicenter pivotal FDA IDE trial.
Objective: The objective of this study was to investigate efficacy and safety of i-Factor Bone Graft (i-Factor) compared with local autograft in single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for cervical radiculopathy.
Summary Of Background Data: i-Factor is a composite bone substitute material consisting of the P-15 synthetic collagen fragment adsorbed onto anorganic bone mineral and suspended in an inert biocompatible hydrogel carrier. P-15 has demonstrated bone healing efficacy in dental, orthopedic, and nonhuman applications.
Methods: Patients randomly received either autograft (N = 154) or i-Factor (N = 165) in a cortical ring allograft. Study success was defined as noninferiority in fusion, Neck Disability Index (NDI), and Neurological Success endpoints, and similar adverse events profile at 12 months.
Results: At 12 months (follow-up rate 87%), both i-Factor and autograft subjects demonstrated a high fusion rate (88.97% and 85.82%, respectively, noninferiority P = 0.0004), significant improvements in NDI (28.75 and 27.40, respectively, noninferiority P < 0.0001), and high Neurological Success rate (93.71% and 93.01%, respectively, noninferiority P < 0.0001). There was no difference in the rate of adverse events (83.64% and 82.47% in the i-Factor and autograft groups, respectively, P = 0.8814). Overall success rate consisting of fusion, NDI, Neurological Success and Safety Success was higher in i-Factor subjects than in autograft subjects (68.75% and 56.94%, respectively, P = 0.0382). Improvements in VAS pain and SF-36v2 scores were clinically relevant and similar between the groups. A high proportion of patients reported good or excellent Odom outcomes (81.4% in both groups).
Conclusion: i-Factor has met all four FDA mandated noninferiority success criteria and has demonstrated safety and efficacy in single-level ACDF for cervical radiculopathy. i-Factor and autograft groups demonstrated significant postsurgical improvement and high fusion rates.
Level Of Evidence: 1.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000001466 | DOI Listing |
Acta Neurochir (Wien)
November 2024
Duke Spine Division, Departments of Neurological and Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Unlabelled: BACKGROUND : The use of bone morphogenic protein (BMP-2) in adult spine deformity (ASD) surgery remains controversial more than two decades following its approval for clinical application in spine surgery. This study was performed to assess outcomes in patients undergoing ASD surgery with BMP application compared with a combination of bone marrow aspirate, cancellous bone chips and i-Factor.
Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study.
J Hip Preserv Surg
August 2022
La Trobe Sport and Exercise Medicine Research Centre, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC 3086, Australia.
The aims of this study were to compare, in patients with and without the use of i-FACTOR bone graft during periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) surgery for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH), (i) bone healing at six-weeks post-operatively (ii) rate of complications. This was a retrospective review of case records. Participants were people aged 15-50 years undergoing rectus-sparing minimally invasive PAO surgery for DDH.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFClin Spine Surg
July 2023
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Neurosurgery
April 2023
Department of Health Services, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Background: Previous analyses of the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Investigational Device Exemption study demonstrated the superiority of i-FACTOR compared with local autograft bone in single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) at 12 and 24 months postoperatively in a composite end point of overall success.
Objective: To report the final, 6-year clinical and radiological outcomes of the FDA postapproval study.
Methods: Of the original 319 subjects enrolled in the Investigational Device Exemption study, 220 participated in the postapproval study (106 i-FACTOR and 114 control).
J Orthop Sports Med
September 2022
College of Medicine, Northeast Ohio Medical University (NEOMED), Rootstown, OH, USA.
The rat animal model is a cost effective and reliable model used in spinal pre-clinical research. Complications from various surgical procedures in humans often arise that were based on these pre-clinical animal models. Therefore safe and efficacious pre-clinical animal models are needed to establish continuity into clinical trials.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!