Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Objective: The objective of this study was to identify a group at negligible risk of para-aortic lymph node metastasis (LNM) in endometrial cancer and its presumed prognosis.
Methods: We enrolled 555 patients with endometrial cancer who underwent preoperative endometrial biopsy, pelvic magnetic resonance imaging, and determination of serum cancer antigen (CA)125, and surgical treatment including lymphadenectomy. Three risk factors for LNM confirmed in previous reports were grade 3/non-endometrioid histology, large tumor volume, and a high CA125 value. Pelvic LNM rate, para-aortic LNM rate, and 5-year overall survival rate were assessed in four groups according to the number of these risk factors.
Results: LNM was noted in medical records of 74 patients (13.3%). Of 226 patients in the no risk factor group, pelvic LNM was noted in the medical records of five (2.2%), but no para-aortic LNM was noted. The 3-year/5-year survival rates in the no risk factor group were 97.2/96.6%, with a median follow-up period of 65.5 months. Of 186 patients in the one risk factor group, 21 (11.2%) had pelvic LNM. Of 113 patients undergoing para-aortic LN dissection in the one risk factor group, six (5.3%) had para-aortic LNM.
Conclusion: Patients with grade 1/2 histology based on endometrial biopsy, small tumor volume assessed by magnetic resonance imaging, and low CA125 value are supposed to have negligible risk of para-aortic LNM. In such patients, the para-aortic region might not be considered as a target to be assessed by staging procedure.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.01.024 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!