Combination Social Protection for Reducing HIV-Risk Behavior Among Adolescents in South Africa.

J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr

*Centre for Evidence-Based Intervention, Department of Social Policy and Intervention, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; †Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa; ‡School of Clinical Medicine and DST-NRF Centre of Excellence in Human Development, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa; and §Health Psychology Unit, Department of Infection and Population Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.

Published: May 2016

Background: Social protection (ie, cash transfers, free schools, parental support) has potential for adolescent HIV prevention. We aimed to identify which social protection interventions are most effective and whether combined social protection has greater effects in South Africa.

Methods: In this prospective longitudinal study, we interviewed 3516 adolescents aged 10-18 between 2009 and 2012. We sampled all homes with a resident adolescent in randomly selected census areas in 4 urban and rural sites in 2 South African provinces. We measured household receipt of 14 social protection interventions and incidence of HIV-risk behaviors. Using gender-disaggregated multivariate logistic regression and marginal effects analyses, we assessed respective contributions of interventions and potential combination effects.

Results: Child-focused grants, free schooling, school feeding, teacher support, and parental monitoring were independently associated with reduced HIV-risk behavior incidence (odds ratio: 0.10-0.69). Strong effects of combination social protection were shown, with cumulative reductions in HIV-risk behaviors. For example, girls' predicted past-year incidence of economically driven sex dropped from 11% with no interventions to 2% among those with a child grant, free school, and good parental monitoring. Similarly, girls' incidence of unprotected/casual sex or multiple partners dropped from 15% with no interventions to 10% with either parental monitoring or school feeding, and to 7% with both interventions.

Conclusion: In real world, high-epidemic conditions, "combination social protection," shows strong HIV prevention effects for adolescents and may maximize prevention efforts.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4839503PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/QAI.0000000000000938DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

social protection
24
parental monitoring
12
combination social
8
hiv-risk behavior
8
hiv prevention
8
protection interventions
8
hiv-risk behaviors
8
school feeding
8
protection
6
social
6

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!