Background: In previous analyses of BENEFIT, a phase 3 study, belatacept-based immunosuppression, as compared with cyclosporine-based immunosuppression, was associated with similar patient and graft survival and significantly improved renal function in kidney-transplant recipients. Here we present the final results from this study.
Methods: We randomly assigned kidney-transplant recipients to a more-intensive belatacept regimen, a less-intensive belatacept regimen, or a cyclosporine regimen. Efficacy and safety outcomes for all patients who underwent randomization and transplantation were analyzed at year 7 (month 84).
Results: A total of 666 participants were randomly assigned to a study group and underwent transplantation. Of the 660 patients who were treated, 153 of the 219 patients treated with the more-intensive belatacept regimen, 163 of the 226 treated with the less-intensive belatacept regimen, and 131 of the 215 treated with the cyclosporine regimen were followed for the full 84-month period; all available data were used in the analysis. A 43% reduction in the risk of death or graft loss was observed for both the more-intensive and the less-intensive belatacept regimens as compared with the cyclosporine regimen (hazard ratio with the more-intensive regimen, 0.57; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.35 to 0.95; P=0.02; hazard ratio with the less-intensive regimen, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.35 to 0.94; P=0.02), with equal contributions from the lower rates of death and graft loss. The mean estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) increased over the 7-year period with both belatacept regimens but declined with the cyclosporine regimen. The cumulative frequencies of serious adverse events at month 84 were similar across treatment groups.
Conclusions: Seven years after transplantation, patient and graft survival and the mean eGFR were significantly higher with belatacept (both the more-intensive regimen and the less-intensive regimen) than with cyclosporine. (Funded by Bristol-Myers Squibb; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00256750.).
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1506027 | DOI Listing |
Transplant Cell Ther
December 2024
Hematology/Oncology, The Hospital for Sick Children and the University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Background: Allogeneic transplant for patients with transfusion-dependent thalassemia is challenging once there has been iron overload and chronic transfusion support.
Objective(s): A transplant strategy that reduced intensity of the preparative regimen and tailored immunosuppression to both support donor engraftment and prevent GVHD was developed for this population. The combination of a pretransplant immunosuppression phase with reduced dosing of fludarabine/prednisone, treosulfan-based preparative regimen with reduced cyclophosphamide dosing, and introduction of a calcineurin/methotrexate-free GVHD prophylaxis/engraftment supporting regimen with abatacept/sirolimus/ATG was tested.
J Nephrol
December 2024
Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, Università Degli Studi Di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Ther Drug Monit
November 2024
Department of Nephrology and Transplantation, Erasmus Medical Center, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; and.
Purpose: In this review, the authors summarized the latest developments in costimulatory blockade to prevent rejection after solid organ transplantation (SOT) and discussed possibilities for future research and the need for therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of these agents.
Methods: Studies about costimulatory blockers in SOT in humans or animal transplant models in the past decade (2014-2024) were systematically reviewed in PubMed, European Union clinical trials (EudraCT), and ClinicalTrials.gov.
G Ital Nefrol
October 2024
Struttura Complessa di Nefrologia Dialisi e Trapianto, AOU Città Della Salute e Della Scienza di Torino e Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche, Università di Torino.
Pharmaceuticals (Basel)
September 2024
Department of Ophthalmology, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami Miller School Medicine, Miami, FL 33136, USA.
The treatment of arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (AAION), non-arteritic ischemic optic neuropathy (NAAION), and posterior ischemic optic neuropathy (PION) is a topic of ongoing research with mixed evidence on some pharmacotherapies and a need for more consensus. This manuscript provides an overview of these conditions' current, potential future, and attempted pharmacotherapies. AAION's current treatment regimen consists of high-dose steroids, with methotrexate, tocilizumab, and abatacept, being the most viable steroid-sparing therapy candidates.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!