A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Complications after Intramedullary Stabilization of Proximal Femur Fractures: a Retrospective Analysis of 178 Patients. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • Secondary dislocation, non-union, re-fracture, and implant failure are common complications associated with intramedullary fixation using the PFN(®) for proximal femur fractures.
  • The study aimed to evaluate the influence of patient-specific factors like complex fracture types and poor bone quality, as well as treatment-specific factors such as inadequate fracture reduction and implant positioning on these complications.
  • Results showed that patients without patient-specific risk factors had good outcomes, while those with complex fractures or poor bone quality faced higher complication rates, indicating that the PFN is effective for simpler cases but presents challenges for more complicated fractures.

Article Abstract

Secondary dislocation, non-union, re-fracture and implant failure are generally known complications after intramedullary fixation of proximal femur fractures with the PFN(®) (Synthes GmbH, Solothurn, Switzerland). The goal of our study was to assess the impact of patient- and treatment-specific risk factors on these complications. Complex fracture type and poor bone quality were defined as patient-specific risk factors. Inadequate fracture reduction and implant position were defined as treatment-specific risk factors. One hundred and seventy-eight cases were retrospectively analyzed. All patients had at least one clinical and radiological follow-up examination 3-6 months after the operation. Fifty percent of the patients were available for one more follow-up at least 1 year after the operation. All patients without patient-specific risk factors had a good outcome, irrespective of whether treatmentspecific risk factors were present or absent. In 153 of the 178 cases, patients had a complex type of fracture and/or poor bone quality. Of these patients, 27 (15.2%) had a poor result. Twenty-four of these patients needed re-operation within 6 months. Complication rate in these patients highly depended on treatment-specific risk factors. We conclude that the PFN is a secure implant for the stabilization of simple cases. Stabilization of complex proximal femoral fractures with the PFN, however, has a relevant complication rate and should therefore be considered a challenge.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00068-007-6010-3DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

risk factors
24
treatment-specific risk
12
complications intramedullary
8
proximal femur
8
femur fractures
8
patients
8
poor bone
8
bone quality
8
patient-specific risk
8
complication rate
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!