Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Secondary dislocation, non-union, re-fracture and implant failure are generally known complications after intramedullary fixation of proximal femur fractures with the PFN(®) (Synthes GmbH, Solothurn, Switzerland). The goal of our study was to assess the impact of patient- and treatment-specific risk factors on these complications. Complex fracture type and poor bone quality were defined as patient-specific risk factors. Inadequate fracture reduction and implant position were defined as treatment-specific risk factors. One hundred and seventy-eight cases were retrospectively analyzed. All patients had at least one clinical and radiological follow-up examination 3-6 months after the operation. Fifty percent of the patients were available for one more follow-up at least 1 year after the operation. All patients without patient-specific risk factors had a good outcome, irrespective of whether treatmentspecific risk factors were present or absent. In 153 of the 178 cases, patients had a complex type of fracture and/or poor bone quality. Of these patients, 27 (15.2%) had a poor result. Twenty-four of these patients needed re-operation within 6 months. Complication rate in these patients highly depended on treatment-specific risk factors. We conclude that the PFN is a secure implant for the stabilization of simple cases. Stabilization of complex proximal femoral fractures with the PFN, however, has a relevant complication rate and should therefore be considered a challenge.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00068-007-6010-3 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!