[Phase II clinical trial of two different modes of administration of the induction chemotherapy for locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma].

Objective: To compare the therapeutic effects, toxic side effects and influence on the immune function in patients treated with TPF [docetaxel (DOC) + cisplatin (DDP) + 5-fluorouracil (5-Fu)] induction chronochemotherapy and conventional chemotherapy for locally advanced nasopharyngeal (NPC).

Methods: Seventy patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma were treated in our department at their first visit from April 2013 to December 2013. They were divided randomly into two groups: the chronochemotherapy group (38 patients) and conventional chemotherapy group (32 patients). All of the patients were treated with TPF regimen with 2 cycles of induction chemotherapy in a 21-28-days/cycle. The chronochemotherapy group: DOC: 75 mg/m2, i. v. gtt, d1 (03: 30-04: 30); DDP: 75 mg/m2, 10 am-10 pm, c.i.v, d1-d5; 5-Fu: 750 mg·m(-2)·d(-1), 10 pm-10 am, c. i.v., d1-d5, both chemotherapies were administered by intravenous infusion using an automatic electric pump. The conventional chemotherapy group: Both DOC and DDP were administered intravenously at a dose of 75 mg/m2 on d1. 5-Fu was given at a dose of 750 mg/m2 for 24 hours from d1-d5 with continuous infusion in a total of 120 hours. In this procedure, prescribing the conventional intravenous infusion, intensity modulated radiation therapy was used after the induction chemotherapy. The prescribed nasopharyngeal lesion dose (GTVnx) was 69.96 Gy/33 fractions for the T1-T2 nasopharygeal cancer, while 73.92 Gy/33 fractions nasopharynx lesion dose (GTVnx) for the T3-T4 nasopharyngeal cancer. The planning target volume (PTV) of positive lymph node (PTVnd) dose was 69.96 Gy/33 fractions. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy: cisplatin 100 mg/m2, i. v. gtt. d1-d2, and there were two cycles in total and 21 days each cycle.

Results: Sixty-six patients were evaluable for the response assessment. There were 36 patients in the chronochemotherapy group and 30 patients in the conventional chemotherapy group. After the induction chemotherapy, no CR case was found in both of the two groups. The PR was 80.6% in the chronochemotherapy group and 50.0% in the conventional chemotherapy group (P=0.009). After concurrent chemoradiotherapy, the CR rate in the chronocheotherapy group was 45.5%, significantly higher than 20.7% in the conventional chemotherapy group (P=0.040). Secondly, the incidence rates of adverse reactions including bone marrow suppression, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, constipation, oral mucositis, fatigue, anorexia in the chrono-chemotherapy group were significantly lower than that in the conventional group (P<0.05 for all). Finally, compared the two groups, the CD4+ /CD8+ ratio was significantly lower in the chronochemotherapy group than that in the conventional chemotherapy group (P<0.05). The lymphocytes CD19+ and CD4+/CD8+ were decreased and CD3+, CD4+, CD8+, CD16++CD56+ were increased in the chronochemotherapy group, while only CD3+ and CD8+ were increased in the conventional chemotherapy group.

Conclusions: Compared with the conventional chemotherapy, the chronochemotherapy may be more favorable in the treatment of NPC, with a better therapeutic effects and effectiveness than that of conventional chemotherapy after induction chemotherapy, with less side effects, and can improve the immune function in the patients.