Radial Artery Occlusion After Transradial Interventions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

J Am Heart Assoc

Keele Cardiovascular Research Group, University of Keele, Stoke-on-Trent, UK (M.R., C.S.K., M.A.M.) Royal Stoke Hospital, University Hospital North Midlands Trust, Stoke-on-Trent, UK (K.R., A.L., J.N., M.A.M.) Farr Institute, Institute of Population Health, University of Manchester, UK (M.A.M.).

Published: January 2016

AI Article Synopsis

  • RAO (Radial artery occlusion) is a common issue after transradial interventions that can hinder future access and use of the radial artery as an arterial conduit.
  • A meta-analysis of 66 studies involving over 31,000 participants showed that the incidence of RAO can range from <1% to 33%, influenced by the timing of assessments and various factors such as heparin dosage and compression time.
  • To reduce the risk of RAO, higher doses of heparin and shorter compression times are recommended, while also considering factors like age and sheath size, although these do not consistently affect outcomes in all studies.

Article Abstract

Background: Radial artery occlusion (RAO) may occur posttransradial intervention and limits the radial artery as a future access site, thus precluding its use as an arterial conduit. In this study, we investigate the incidence and factors influencing the RAO in the current literature.

Methods And Results: We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE for studies of RAO in transradial access. Relevant studies were identified and data were extracted. Data were synthesized by meta-analysis, quantitative pooling, graphical representation, or by narrative synthesis. A total of 66 studies with 31 345 participants were included in the analysis. Incident RAO ranged between <1% and 33% and varied with timing of assessment of radial artery patency (incidence of RAO within 24 hours was 7.7%, which decreased to 5.5% at >1 week follow-up). The most efficacious measure in reducing RAO was higher dose of heparin, because lower doses of heparin were associated with increased RAO (risk ratio 0.36, 95% CI 0.17-0.76), whereas shorter compression times also reduced RAO (risk ratio 0.28, 95% CI 0.05-1.50). Several factors were found to be associated with RAO including age, sex, sheath size, and diameter of radial artery, but these factors were not consistent across all studies.

Conclusions: RAO is a common complication of transradial access. Maintenance of radial patency should be an integral part of all procedures undertaken through the radial approach. High-dose heparin along with shorter compression times and patent hemostasis is recommended in reducing RAO.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4859386PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.115.002686DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

radial artery
16
rao
10
artery occlusion
8
transradial access
8
reducing rao
8
rao risk
8
risk ratio
8
shorter compression
8
compression times
8
radial
6

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!