A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Unexpected benign histopathology after pancreatoduodenectomy for presumed malignancy: accepting the inevitable. | LitMetric

Unexpected benign histopathology after pancreatoduodenectomy for presumed malignancy: accepting the inevitable.

Langenbecks Arch Surg

Gastrointestinal and Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Service, Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Ernest Borges Marg, Parel, Mumbai, 400012, India.

Published: March 2016

Background: Differentiating malignant and benign disease in the pancreatic head and periampullary region is difficult. The aim of this retrospective study was to analyze patients with unexpected "benign" disease after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) to evaluate the incidence, possible discriminating factors, and outcome. The role of preoperative pathology interpretation in diagnosing malignancy was also assessed.

Methods: Patients with unexpected benign disease were identified from a prospectively maintained database of 446 PDs for presumed malignancy from April 2006 to December 2013. Clinical, radiological, and pathological features were reviewed. Positive predictive values (PPVs) of preoperative pathology interpretation were analyzed. Short-term outcomes were compared.

Results: Incidence of unexpected benign disease was 6.5 % (29/446). Radiological diagnostic signs (except the double duct sign) suggestive of malignancy were seen in more than half of the benign cases. Preoperative pathology 'positive' or 'suspicious for malignancy' had a PPV of 97.6 % and 'indeterminate disease' and had a PPV of 90 % for malignancy. 'Benign' or 'negative' pathology had a PPV of 19 % for benign disease in strongly suspected malignancy. There was no significant difference in outcomes in PD for benign versus malignant disease except for a decreased rate of POPFs and a higher trend toward mortality. However, both outcomes were not independently associated with benign disease.

Conclusions: A small percentage of benign disease after PD for "strongly suspected malignancy" is inevitable. No radiological or pathological features can reliably discriminate benign from malignant in these patients. Trend toward higher mortality after PD for unexpected benign disease exists. Detailed preoperative pathological subclassifications are helpful in malignancy.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00423-016-1372-9DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

benign disease
24
unexpected benign
16
preoperative pathology
12
benign
10
presumed malignancy
8
disease
8
patients unexpected
8
pathology interpretation
8
radiological pathological
8
pathological features
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!