A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Learner Perspectives of a Surgical Educators Faculty Development Program Regarding Value and Effectiveness: A Qualitative Study. | LitMetric

Learner Perspectives of a Surgical Educators Faculty Development Program Regarding Value and Effectiveness: A Qualitative Study.

Plast Reconstr Surg

Temple, Texas From the Division of Plastic Surgery, the Division of Hematology & Oncology, and the Department of Medical Education, BaylorScott & White Health, Texas A&M Health Science Center.

Published: March 2016

Background: The BaylorScott & White Health Division of Plastic Surgery began a faculty development program designed to train clinicians to be better educators. The program consisted of presession reading, 11 small group didactic sessions, and individually chosen educational projects. Cross-discipline collaboration was pursued by enrolling faculty and students from diverse departments. Department chair permission was required for participation. The purpose of this qualitative study was to explore learner perspectives of the Surgical Educators Program.

Methods: Fourteen physicians completed the Surgical Educators Program. Focus groups were held with the learners who completed the 2011 and 2012 programs 6 months after completion. The groups were moderated by an educational faculty member who was not involved in any aspect of the course. Questions were designed to elicit the components of the course curriculum of significance to the learners. Narrative data were digitally recorded and transcribed verbatim, and the investigators performed independent content analyses to identify themes. The data were thematically coded and summarized using calculation of frequencies.

Results: Thirteen learners participated in the focus groups. Three main themes were identified. First, the program increased the participants' knowledge and practice of medical education. Second, the structure of the program was a key contributor to the outcomes. Third, the program produced a community of practice.

Conclusions: This study suggests that a faculty development program comprising a diverse group of physicians consisting of readings, guided small group sessions, and a mandatory project can train plastic surgical faculty to become better surgical educators within the constraints of a busy clinical practice.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000475825.09531.68DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

surgical educators
16
faculty development
12
development program
12
learner perspectives
8
perspectives surgical
8
program
8
qualitative study
8
educators program
8
small group
8
focus groups
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!