Objective: This study investigated how frontal white matter (WM) alterations in patients with bipolar I disorder (BD-I) are linked to motivational dysregulation, often reported in the form of risk-taking and impulsivity, and whether structure-function relations in patients might differ from healthy subjects (HC).
Method: We acquired diffusion data from 24 euthymic BD-I patients and 24 controls, to evaluate WM integrity of selected frontal tracts. Risk-taking was assessed by the Cambridge Gambling Task and impulsivity by self-report with the Barratt-Impulsiveness Scale.
Results: BD-I patients displayed significantly lower integrity in the right cingulum compared to HC. They also showed more risk-taking behavior and reported increased trait-impulsivity. Risk-taking was negatively associated with WM integrity in the right cingulum. Impulsivity was not related to WM integrity in investigated tracts. Together with age and sex, FA in the cingulum explained 25% of variance in risk-taking scores in all study participants. The left inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus (IFOF) was specifically predictive of risk-taking behavior in BD-I patients, but not in HC.
Limitations: The employed parameters did not allow us to specify the exact origin of WM changes, nor did the method allow the analysis of specific brain subregions. Also, sample size was moderate and the sample included patients with lifetime alcohol dependence/abuse, hence effects found need replication and have to be interpreted with caution.
Conclusion: Our results further strengthen recent models linking structural changes in frontal networks to behavioral markers of BD-I. They extend recent findings by showing that risk-taking is also linked to the cingulum in BD-I and HC, while other prefrontal tracts (IFOF) are specifically implicated in risk-taking behavior in BD-I patients. Meanwhile, self-reported impulsivity was not associated with WM integrity of the tracts investigated in our study.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2015.12.019 | DOI Listing |
BMC Psychiatry
January 2025
School of Nursing, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, 311121, China.
Objective: In recent years, there has been a rapid increase in reports upon social-cognition impairments in bipolar disorder. This study aimed to compare the characteristics of social cognition domains in bipolar I (BD I) and II (BD II) based on the findings to date.
Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted on Web of Science and PubMed from inception to 28 August 2024.
Indian J Psychiatry
November 2024
Department of Psychiatry, Murshidabad Medical College and Hospital, Murshidabad, West Bengal, India.
Background: There is lack of data on bipolar disorder (BD) type II from India.
Aim: To compare the demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with BD-I and BD-II using the data of the Bipolar Disorder Course and Outcome study from India (BiD-CoIN study).
Methodology: Using the data of the BiD-CoIN study, patients with BD-I and BD-II were compared for demographic and clinical variables.
Compr Psychiatry
February 2025
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University Hospital, Yilan, Taiwan; Institute of Neuroscience and Brain Research Center, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Education and Research, Taipei City Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan. Electronic address:
Background: Over 25 % of bipolar disorder (BD) patients are misdiagnosed with major depressive disorder (MDD). An urgent need exists for a biomarker to differentiate BD from MDD. Various manifestations and intensities of maladaptive guilt processing might uniquely contribute to the pathogenesis of BD compared to MDD.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Clin Psychiatry
December 2024
Department of Psychiatry, Zucker Hillside Hospital, Glen Oaks, New York.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!