Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
A survey was conducted to determine the frequency of obstetric ultrasonography use, its value in detecting fetal anomalies, and the frequency with which ultrasound errors lead to malpractice allegations. Questionnaires were sent to one-fifth of The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Fellows in District IV and were returned by 68%. Ultrasound equipment is housed in the offices of nearly 64% of the responding obstetricians, and ultrasound scanning is used in 69% of pregnancies in the district. Over 67% of obstetricians have detected one or more fetal anomalies by ultrasonography, and over 51% have overlooked anomalies. Ultrasound-related lawsuits were reported by 4.7% of the respondents.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!