AI Article Synopsis

  • The study focuses on predicting the risk of revision in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) due to osteoarthritis (OA) by using a biomechanical model.
  • Data from 11 revision cases and 67 randomly selected UKA cases were analyzed, applying finite element method (FEM) and Kernel Ridge Regression (KRR) to assess tissue strain and revision risk.
  • The integrated model demonstrated a high prediction accuracy of 93.58%, indicating its potential value as a decision-making tool for surgical planning in knee OA treatment.

Article Abstract

Objective: Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) revision is usually due to the degenerative degree of knee articular osteochondral tissue in the untreated compartment. However, it is difficult to simulate the biomechanical behavior on this tissue accurately. This study presents and validates a reliable system to predict which osteoarthritis (OA) patients may suffer revision as a result of biomechanical reasons after having UKA.

Design: We collected all revision cases available (n = 11) and randomly selected 67 UKA cases to keep the revision prevalence of almost 14%. All these 78 cases have been followed at least 2 years. An elastic model is designed to characterize the biomechanical behavior of the articular osteochondral tissue for each patient. After calculated the force on the tissue, finite element method (FEM) is applied to calculating the strain of each tissue node. Kernel Ridge Regression (KRR) method is used to model the relationship between the strain information and the risk of revision. Therefore, the risk of UKA revision can be predicted by this integrated model.

Results: Leave-one-out (LOO) cross-validation (CV) is implemented to assess the prediction accuracy. As a result, the mean prediction accuracy is 93.58% for all these cases, demonstrating the high value of this model as a decision-making assistant for surgical plaining of knee OA.

Conclusions: The results of this study demonstrated that this integrated model can predict the risk of UKA revision with theoretically high accuracy. It combines bio-mechanical and statistical learning approach to create a surgical planning tool which may support clinical decision in the future.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5087601PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2016.01.004DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

uka revision
12
unicompartmental knee
8
knee arthroplasty
8
revision
8
articular osteochondral
8
osteochondral tissue
8
biomechanical behavior
8
risk uka
8
prediction accuracy
8
tissue
5

Similar Publications

Background: Revision of a unicompartmental to a total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is often compared to primary TKA with regard to its technical difficulty and complication rates. We sought to compare medical and surgical complications following revision unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) to those following primary TKA and aseptic revision TKA.

Methods: A national administrative claims database was queried for patients undergoing revision UKA between 2010 and 2019.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Current status of bicompartmental arthroplasty.

Arthroplasty

January 2025

Department of Orthopedics, School of Medicine, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 201112, China.

Background: Bicompartmental arthroplasty (BCA) serves as a less invasive alternative to total knee arthroplasty. This review aims to present the current status of BCA. BODY: Recent literature on BCA was reviewed and synthesized from the perspectives of function, radiological assessment, patient satisfaction, survival rate, patellar tracking, satisfaction survey, and revision rate.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The use of an imageless robotic system in revision of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc

December 2024

Sezione di Chirurgia Protesica ad Indirizzo Robotico, Unità di Traumatologia Dello Sport, UOC Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Brescia, Italy.

Purpose: The application of robotics in revision arthroplasty particularly from unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) to total knee arthroplasty (TKA), is underexplored. The purpose of this study is to describe the surgical technique of an imageless robotic system used in the revision of UKA to TKA and to evaluate short- to mid-term outcomes.

Methods: This prospective study includes 35 patients treated from May 2020 to July 2023.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Metal-backed versus all-poly tibia in the original cartier unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: outcomes and survivorship at long-term follow-up.

Arch Orthop Trauma Surg

December 2024

Sezione di Chirurgia Protesica ad Indirizzo Robotico Unità di Traumatologia dello Sport, Fondazione Poliambulanza Istituto Ospedaliero, Brescia, Italy.

Purpose: Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is a viable option for localized osteoarthritis (OA) or avascular osteonecrosis with several advantages over total knee arthroplasty (TKA). UKA implants may feature a tibial component either all-polyethylene (AP) or metal-backed (MB). This study aims to retrospectively compare the clinical outcomes and survivorship of 74 UKAs over 16 years, focusing on comparing the results and survivorship of MB versus AP tibial tray.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) procedures have become much more common in the United States in recent years, with >40,000 UKAs performed annually. However, it is estimated that 10% to 40% of UKAs fail and thus require conversion to total knee arthroplasty (TKA). In the field of total joint arthroplasty, robotic-assisted surgeries have demonstrated advantages such as better accuracy and precision of implant positioning and improved restoration of a neutral mechanical axis.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!