Understanding the molecular basis of agonist/antagonist mechanism of GPER1/GPR30 through structural and energetic analyses.

J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol

Laboratorio de Modelado Molecular, Bioinformática y Diseño de Fármacos de la Escuela Superior de Medicina, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Plan de San Luis Y Diaz Mirón S/N, Col. Casco de Santo Tomas, Mexico City CP 11340, Mexico.

Published: April 2016

The G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) represent the largest superfamily of membrane proteins in charge to pass the cell signaling after binding with their cognate ligands to the cell interior. In breast cancer, a GPCR named GPER1 plays a key role in the process of growth and the proliferation of cancer cells. In a previous study, theoretical methods were applied to construct a model of GPER1, which later was submitted to molecular dynamics (MD) simulations to perform a docking calculation. Based on this preceding work, it is known that GPER1 is sensitive to structural differences in its binding site. However, due to the nature of that past study, conformational changes linked to the ligand binding were not observed. Therefore, in this study, in order to explore the conformational changes coupled to the agonist/antagonist binding, MD simulations of about 0.25μs were performed for the free and bound states, summarizing 0.75μs of MD simulation in total. For the bound states, one agonist (G-1) and antagonist (G-15) were chosen since is widely known that these two molecules cause an impact on GPER1 mobility. Based on the conformational ensemble generated through MD simulations, we found that despite G-1 and G-15 being stabilized by similar map of residues, the structural differences between both ligands impact the hydrogen bond pattern not only at the GPER1 binding site but also along the seven-helix bundle, causing significant differences in the conformational mobility along the extracellular and cytoplasmic domain, and to a lesser degree in the curvatures of helix 2, helix 3 and helix 7 between the free and bound states, which is in agreement with reported literature, and might be linked to microscopic characteristics of the activated-inactivated transition. Furthermore, binding free energy calculations using the MM/GBSA method for the bound states, followed by an alanine scanning analysis allowed us to identify some important residues for the complex stabilization.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsbmb.2016.01.001DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

bound states
16
structural differences
8
binding site
8
conformational changes
8
free bound
8
helix helix
8
binding
6
gper1
5
understanding molecular
4
molecular basis
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!