Survival in HIV-positive transplant recipients compared with transplant candidates and with HIV-negative controls.

AIDS

aDepartment of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CaliforniabEMMES Corporation, Rockville, MarylandcIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New YorkdBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MassachusettseUniversity of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PennsylvaniafRush University Medical Center, Chicago, IllinoisgDavid Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA and Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los AngeleshDepartment of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.*Douglas W. Hanto's current affiliation is Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.†George Beatty current affiliation is California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, California, USA.

Published: January 2016

Objectives: To evaluate the impact of liver and kidney transplantation on survival in HIV-positive transplant candidates and compare outcomes between HIV-positive and negative recipients.

Design: Observational cohort of HIV-positive transplant candidates and recipients and secondary analysis comparing study recipients to HIV-negative national registry controls.

Methods: We fit proportional hazards models to assess transplantation impact on mortality among recipients and candidates. We compared time to graft failure and death with HIV-negative controls in unmatched, demographic-matched, and risk-adjusted models.

Results: There were 17 (11.3%) and 46 (36.8%) deaths among kidney and liver recipients during a median follow-up of 4.0 and 3.5 years, respectively. Transplantation was associated with survival benefit for HIV-infected liver recipients with model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) greater than or equal 15 [hazard ratio (HR) 0.1; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.05, 0.01; P < 0.0001], but not for MELD less than 15 (HR 0.7; 95% CI 0.3, 1.8; P = 0.43) or for kidney recipients (HR 0.6; 95% CI 0.3, 1.4; P = 0.23). In HIV-positive kidney recipients, unmatched and risk-matched analyses indicated a marginally significant HR for graft loss [1.3 (P = 0.07) and HR 1.4 (P = 0.052)]; no significant increase in risk of death was observed. All models demonstrated a higher relative hazard of graft loss or death in HIV-positive liver recipients; the absolute difference in the proportion of deaths was 6.7% in the risk-matched analysis.

Conclusion: Kidney transplantation should be standard of care for well managed HIV-positive patients. Liver transplant in candidates with high MELD confers survival benefit; transplant is a viable option in selected candidates. The increased mortality risk compared with HIV-negative recipients was modest.

Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.Gov; NCT00074386; http://clinicaltrials.gov/.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4957135PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/QAD.0000000000000934DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

hiv-positive transplant
12
transplant candidates
12
survival hiv-positive
8
hiv-negative controls
8
liver recipients
8
recipients
6
transplant
4
transplant recipients
4
recipients compared
4
compared transplant
4

Similar Publications

Patients with multiple myeloma (MM) often experience infections due to aberrant immunoglobulin production by malignant plasma cells and immunosuppressive therapeutic interventions that are used to treat the condition. A rare but serious infection that may occur in these patients is Cryptococcus, an encapsulated fungus that typically infects immunocompromised individuals. Cryptococcus infections often present as pneumonia but can disseminate to the central nervous system, potentially causing meningitis.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Non-colorectal Cancer Screening and Vaccinations in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Expert Review.

Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol

January 2025

Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville FL. Electronic address:

Description: The aim of this American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) Clinical Practice Update (CPU) is to provide best practice advice (BPA) statements for gastroenterologists and other health care providers who provide care to patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The focus is on IBD-specific screenings (excluding colorectal cancer screening, which is discussed separately) and vaccinations. We provide guidance to ensure that patients are up to date with the disease-specific cancer screenings, vaccinations, as well as advice for mental health and general wellbeing.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: N-of-1 trials compare two or more treatment options for a single participant. These trials have been used to study options for chronic conditions such as arthritis and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. In addition, they have been suggested as a means to study interventions in rare populations that may not be tractable to include in standard clinical trials, such as treatment options for HIV-positive patients in need of organ transplant.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: A precise observation is that the cervix's solid tumors possess hypoxic regions where the oxygen concentration drops below 1.5%. Hypoxia negatively impacts the host's immune system and significantly diminishes the effectiveness of several treatments, including radiotherapy and chemotherapy.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Molecular test for screening malaria-infected blood donors to maximise recipient safety in Acre State, a Brazilian endemic area.

Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz

December 2024

Fundação Oswaldo Cruz-Fiocruz, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Laboratório de Pesquisa em Malária / Centro de Pesquisa, Diagnóstico e Treinamento em Malária, Laboratório de Referência do Ministério da Saúde para Diagnóstico de Malária na Região Extra-Amazônica, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil.

Background: Although blood transfusion is an essential therapeutic procedure, it can present risks, including transmitting infectious diseases, such as malaria. In Acre, the thick blood smear microscopic examination (TBS) is used to screen infected malaria blood donors. However, TBS has low sensitivity for detecting Plasmodium in situations of low parasitaemia, such as those presented by asymptomatic clinically healthy individuals.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!