Objective: The aim of this study was to determine current delirium practices in the intensive care unit (ICU) setting and evaluate awareness and adoption of the 2013 Pain, Agitation, and Delirium (PAD) guidelines with emphasis on delirium management.
Design, Setting, And Participants: A large-scale, multidisciplinary, online survey was administered to physician, pharmacist, nurse, and mid-level practitioner members of the Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM) between September 2014 and October 2014. A total of 635 respondents completed the survey.
Measurements And Main Results: Nonpharmacologic interventions such as early mobilization were used in most ICUs (83%) for prevention of delirium. A majority of respondents (97%) reported using pharmacologic agents to treat hyperactive delirium. Ninety percent of the respondents answered that they were aware of the 2013 PAD guidelines, and 75% of respondents felt that their delirium practices have been changed as a result of the new guidelines. In addition, logistic regression analysis of this study showed that respondents who use delirium screening tools were twice more likely to be fully aware of key components of the updated guidelines (odds ratio [OR] = 2.07, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.20-3.60).
Conclusions: Most critical care practitioners are fully aware and knowledgeable of key recommendations in the new guidelines and have changed their delirium practices accordingly.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0897190015625396 | DOI Listing |
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand
February 2025
Department of Brain and Spinal Cord Injury, Neuroscience Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Background: The harm-benefit balance for early out-of-bed mobilisation of patients with severe acquired brain injury (ABI) in neurointensive care units (neuro-ICUs) is unclear, and there are no clinical guidelines. This study aimed to survey the current clinical practice and perceptions among clinicians involved in first out-of-bed mobilisation in Scandinavian neuro-ICUs.
Methods: This was a cross-sectional, anonymous, web-based survey; the reporting follows the recommended CROSS checklist.
Intensive Crit Care Nurs
January 2025
School of Nursing, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Nursing, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Research Center of Sleep Medicine, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Research Center of Sleep Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan. Electronic address:
Objective: To evaluate the effects of a 4-week Delirium Introduction and Maintenance programme based on the knowledge-to-action framework on nurses' knowledge, self-confidence, attitudes, and screening accuracy for delirium in the paediatric intensive care unit (PICU).
Research Methodology/design: A quasi-experimental study with a pretest-posttest design.
Setting: This study was conducted between January and February 2024 with nurses in two Indonesian PICUs.
Intensive Crit Care Nurs
January 2025
School of Nursing, Capital Medical University, 10 You-an-men Wai Xi-tou-tiao, Feng-tai District Beijing, China. Electronic address:
Objectives: To evaluate the impact of Artificial Intelligence Assisted Prevention and Management for Delirium (AI-AntiDelirium) on improving adherence to delirium guidelines among nurses in the intensive care unit (ICU).
Research Methodology/design: Between November 2022 and June 2023, A cluster randomized controlled trial was undertaken.
Setting: A total of 38 nurses were enrolled in the interventional arm, whereas 42 nurses were recruited for the control arm in six ICUs across two hospitals in Beijing, comparing nurses' adherence and cognitive load in units that use AI-AntiDelirium or the control group.
Alzheimers Dement
December 2024
Hospital Sírio‐Libanês, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
Background: Although delirium is a powerful tool for identifying high‐risk older patients at the emergency department (ED), the feasibility and importance of cognitive screening beyond delirium remain debated in fast‐paced healthcare settings. We estimated the effect of comprehensive but pragmatic cognitive screening, capturing delirium and preexisting cognitive impairment, on predicting adverse outcomes within 90 days of admission in older adults at the ED.
Method: We conducted a prospective cohort study comprising patients aged ≥65 years who were consecutively admitted to the ED of a large general hospital in Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Alzheimers Dement
December 2024
Faculty of Medicine, Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte, Brazil, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil
Background: Cognitive impairment (CI) is a major geriatric syndrome, leading to the loss of an individual’s decision‐making autonomy and representing a significant caregiving burden for families. It is commonly encountered in clinical practice and can be caused by dementia (major neurocognitive disorder), depression, delirium, or mental illness.
Methods: To assess the prevalence and primary causes of cognitive impairment (CI), as well as its correlation with other clinical conditions among bed‐bound or home‐bound elderly individuals from low‐resource communities in Brazil, we carried out a cross‐sectional study.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!