A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

[Role of coronary intervention after successful cardiopulmonary resuscitation]. | LitMetric

[Role of coronary intervention after successful cardiopulmonary resuscitation].

Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol

Klinik für Kardiologie und Pulmologie, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland.

Published: March 2016

Immediate coronary angiography and intervention in suitable stenoses in patients resuscitated from cardiac arrest of presumed coronary origin and return of spontaneous circulation is widely established in interventional centers. The procedure is based on the analogy of positive results achieved with coronary intervention in many forms of acute coronary syndromes on the one hand and otherwise from registries showing promising data from coronary intervention of resuscitated patients. Results from randomized controlled studies, however, are not yet available. With respect to ST-elevation myocardial infarction, the diagnostic reliability of an ECG registered shortly after cardiopulmonary resuscitation is sufficient. The results of the registries are specifically promising for patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction but less favorable for other forms of acute coronary syndromes. Moreover, insight into the results of the registries reveals that patients with the best prognostic conditions were preferentially selected for coronary intervention (e.g., younger patients, those with an initially shockable arrhythmia, bystander resuscitation), whereas those, for example, with cardiac or renal failure were excluded. For better definition of the actual benefit of coronary intervention after resuscitation from cardiac arrest and the optimal target groups, randomized controlled studies on patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction are desirable, while for other forms of acute coronary syndromes these studies are essential.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00399-015-0411-5DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

coronary intervention
20
forms acute
12
acute coronary
12
coronary syndromes
12
st-elevation myocardial
12
myocardial infarction
12
coronary
9
cardiac arrest
8
randomized controlled
8
controlled studies
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!