AI Article Synopsis

  • The study examined the prevalence of monosodium urate (MSU) crystal deposits in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients who also had high serum urate levels, indicating a risk for gout.
  • It involved analyzing 100 RA patients using dual energy computed tomography (DECT) to detect MSU crystals and correlated their presence with various clinical characteristics.
  • Results showed that 20% of patients had MSU deposits, with a significant finding that 70% of affected patients were seronegative for rheumatoid factor, highlighting a notable link between seronegative status and the presence of urate deposits.

Article Abstract

Objectives: To investigate the prevalence of monosodium urate (MSU) crystal deposits, indicative for gout, in a population of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients with concomitant hyperuricemia and to analyze the clinical and disease-specific characteristics of RA patients who exhibit MSU crystal deposits.

Methods: Overall, 100 consecutive patients with the diagnosis of RA and a serum urate level above 6mg/dl underwent dual energy computed tomography (DECT) of both feet and hands to search for MSU crystals in a prospective study between October 2011 and July 2013. Presence and extent of MSU crystal deposits on DECT was assessed by automated volume measurement. Demographic and disease-specific characteristics were recorded and included into two logistic regression models to test for the factors associated with MSU crystal deposits in RA.

Results: Hyperuricemic RA patients were mostly male (55%), over 60 years of age (63 ± 11 years), had established disease (8.7 ± 10.5 years) and a mean disease activity score 28 (DAS 28) of 3.2. In total, 20 out of 100 patients displayed MSU crystal deposits in DECT. Interestingly, the majority (70%) of the RA patients positive for MSU crystal deposits were seronegative RA patients. Hence, every third seronegative RA patient had MSU crystal deposits. According to logistic regression model analysis, seronegative status correlated positively with presence of urate deposits (p = 0.019).

Conclusions: These data show that a considerable number of RA patients display periarticular MSU crystal deposits. Seronegative patients were shown to be predominantly affected with every third patient being positive for urate deposits.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.semarthrit.2015.11.014DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

msu crystal
32
crystal deposits
28
urate deposits
12
deposits
10
patients
10
msu
9
prevalence monosodium
8
monosodium urate
8
population rheumatoid
8
rheumatoid arthritis
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!