Background: There is limited longitudinal data available on the natural history of meniscal tears especially in middle-aged adults with a low prevalence of osteoarthritis (OA). The aim of this study was to describe the natural history of meniscal tears over 8 years and the relationship with change in knee pain and structures.
Methods: One hundred ninety eight participants [mean age 47 (28-63); 57% female] were studied at baseline and 8 years later. Approximately half were the adult offspring of subjects who had a knee replacement performed for knee OA and the remainder were randomly selected controls. Meniscal tears/extrusion, cartilage volume/defects, bone marrow lesions (BMLs) and effusion were assessed on MRI. Knee pain was assessed using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index.
Results: 22% of the participants had at least one meniscal tear at any site at baseline. Over 8 years, 16% of the participants had an increase in severity of meniscal tears while none improved. Increase in meniscal tear score was associated with worsening knee pain (β = +2.81 (+1.40, +4.22)), with offspring having a significantly greater increase in pain severity compared to controls. BMI and presence of osteophytes at baseline, but not knee injury, predicted change in tears, whereas change in meniscal tears was independently associated with cartilage volume loss, change in BMLs and change in meniscal extrusion.
Conclusion: Change in meniscal tears shares risk factors with knee OA and is independently associated with worsening knee pain and structural damage suggesting that meniscal tears are on the knee OA causal pathway.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4700611 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-015-0862-1 | DOI Listing |
BMJ Open
January 2025
Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Warwick Medical School, Coventry, UK.
Objectives: There is a paucity of qualitative research exploring the patient experience of living with a meniscal tear, vital to effective patient management. The aim of this study was to explore the experiences and expectations of treatment of patients aged 18-55 years with a meniscal tear of the knee.
Design: Qualitative study involving semistructured interviews.
J Pain Res
January 2025
Discipline Development Office, Nanjing Sport Institute, Nanjing, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.
Am J Sports Med
January 2025
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.
Knee
January 2025
Keck School of Medicine of USC, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Background: To present rates of reporting bias in systematic reviews and meta-analyses investigating meniscal root repair.
Methods: In this systematic review, PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science databases were queried for studies that investigated meniscal root tears treated with root repair. Included studies were systematic reviews and/or meta-analyses published in peer-reviewed journals in the English language with available full-texts.
Arthrosc Tech
December 2024
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Okayama Rosai Hospital, Minamiku, Okayama, Japan.
This Technical Note describes a surgical approach that combines circumferential fiber augmentation with transtibial pullout repair for the treatment of medial meniscal posterior root tears. To address the challenge of meniscal extrusion and subsequent joint space narrowing that predisposes to osteoarthritis, this technique uses an artificial ligament to add circumferential collagen fiber reinforcement to improve meniscal extrusion. This integrated approach is designed to address the limitations of conventional tibial pullout repairs by potentially providing better results in preventing meniscal extrusion.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!