Purpose: We assessed the pathological outcomes after radical prostatectomy in men with favorable risk prostate cancer diagnosed on first/initial biopsy compared to those of men who were diagnosed on a subsequent/repeat prostate biopsy.
Materials And Methods: We identified 422 patients who met National Comprehensive Cancer Network® very low (199) and low risk (223) prostate cancer definitions who instead underwent radical prostatectomy. In each risk category we compared adverse pathological outcomes, defined as Gleason score upgrading, extraprostatic extension, seminal vesicle invasion and positive surgical margins, between men diagnosed on initial prostate biopsy vs repeat/subsequent prostate biopsy after a negative biopsy(-ies).
Results: There were no significant differences in the baseline clinical and demographic characteristics between the groups. However, men who were diagnosed on initial prostate biopsy demonstrated a higher median maximum cancer percent per single core (p <0.001) and higher median percent of positive cores (p <0.001). Compared to repeat/subsequent prostate biopsy, men diagnosed on initial prostate biopsy had a higher Gleason score upgrade (7 or greater) (57.7% vs 42.1%, p=0.005) and extraprostatic extension (14.1% vs 5.4%, p=0.01). On stratified analysis comparing initial prostate biopsy to repeat/subsequent prostate biopsy, very low risk disease was associated with Gleason score upgrade (49.3% vs 31.8%, p=0.02) and low risk disease demonstrated higher rates of extraprostatic extension (19.9% vs 6.0%, p=0.02).
Conclusions: The likelihood of adverse pathological outcomes at radical prostatectomy is lower in men diagnosed with favorable risk prostate cancer on repeat/subsequent prostate biopsy than in men diagnosed on initial prostate biopsy, and may represent an important consideration in risk stratifying cases of favorable risk prostate cancer.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2015.12.079 | DOI Listing |
Ann Intern Med
January 2025
Durham VA Health Care System, Durham; and Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina (K.M.G.).
Background: Tissue-based genomic classifiers (GCs) have been developed to improve prostate cancer (PCa) risk assessment and treatment recommendations.
Purpose: To summarize the impact of the Decipher, Oncotype DX Genomic Prostate Score (GPS), and Prolaris GCs on risk stratification and patient-clinician decisions on treatment choice among patients with localized PCa considering first-line treatment.
Data Sources: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science published from January 2010 to August 2024.
Oncologist
January 2025
Department of Medical Oncology, Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, ON M5G 2M9, Canada.
Background: Metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) has a poor prognosis, necessitating the investigation of novel treatments and targets. This study evaluated JNJ-70218902 (JNJ-902), a T-cell redirector targeting transmembrane protein with epidermal growth factor-like and 2 follistatin-like domains 2 (TMEFF2) and cluster of differentiation 3, in mCRPC.
Patients And Methods: Patients who had measurable/evaluable mCRPC after at least one novel androgen receptor-targeted therapy or chemotherapy were eligible.
J Clin Lab Anal
January 2025
Department of Medical Biochemistry, University of Health Sciences, Bursa Yuksek Ihtisas Training and Research Hospital, Bursa, Turkey.
Background: In this study, we attempted to select the optimum cases for a prostate biopsy based on routine laboratory test results in addition to prostate-specific antigen (PSA) blood test using H2O automated machine learning (AutoML) software, which includes many common machine learning algorithms.
Methods: The study included 737 patients (46-88 years old). Routine laboratory measurements were used to train machine learning models using H2O AutoML.
Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi
January 2025
Department of Urology, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University Faculty of Medicine.
A 70-years-old man with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer received the apalutamide, an oral androgen receptor signaling inhibitor. On day10 after drug initiation, fever and skin rash appeared on his whole-body surface. He stopped taking the drug on day18 and skin symptoms temporarily improved about 7 days after discontinuation.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFNihon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi
January 2025
Department of Urology, Jikei University of Medicine.
(Objective) This study aimed at evaluating the efficacy and safety of upfront docetaxel (DTX) treatment and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in male patients with high-volume metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (HV-mCSPC). (Methods) This retrospective study was conducted using the medical records of 30 patients treated for HV-mCSPC by using upfront DTX treatment along with ADT at Atsugi City Hospital between December 2015 and December 2022. The patient characteristics, demographics, oncological outcomes, adverse events, and sequential therapy were evaluated.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!