The initial STACKENOX (STACK-on to ENOXaparin) study investigated the effect of stacking unfractionated heparin (UFH) onto a chronic treatment with enoxaparin, a common practice in interventional cardiology when a patient treated with enoxaparin receives an additional bolus of UFH at the time of percutaneous coronary intervention. The study brought to light some unexpected consequences on coagulation tests and hemorrhagic risk. This substudy was performed to provide a pharmacological explanation for these observations. Seventy-two healthy individuals previously treated with enoxaparin for 2.5 days received a stack-on of 70 IU/kg intravenous UFH dose 4, 6, or 10 h after the last enoxaparin dose. Anticoagulation activity was monitored by activated partial thromboplastin time, anti-Xa and anti-IIa activities and a thrombin generation test. In parallel, plasma samples of the individuals receiving the chronic enoxaparin treatment obtained at 4, 6, or 10 h after the last enoxaparin dose were spiked in vitro with a dose of UFH reproducing the concentration achieved in vivo after the bolus of UFH alone. In-vivo stack-on of UFH induced an over-anticoagulation identified by changes in anti-Xa and, less markedly, in anti-IIa and activated partial thromboplastin time levels, whereas in-vitro UFH spiking, only produced an additive effect. We hypothesize that the potentiation of UFH on anti-Xa activity observed in vivo may caused by the UFH bolus mobilizing enoxaparin chains stored in the endothelial glycocalyx during chronic pretreatment. This over-anticoagulation and its potential hemorrhagic risk after stack-on of UFH have obvious clinical implications.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MBC.0000000000000489 | DOI Listing |
JAMA Netw Open
January 2025
Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School-Baystate, Springfield.
Importance: Despite guideline recommendations to use low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) or direct oral anticoagulants in the treatment of most patients with acute pulmonary embolism (PE), US-based studies have found increasing use of unfractionated heparin (UFH) in hospitalized patients.
Objective: To identify barriers and facilitators of guideline-concordant anticoagulation in patients hospitalized with acute PE.
Design, Setting, And Participants: This qualitative study conducted semistructured interviews from February 1 to June 3, 2024, that were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed in an iterative process using reflexive thematic analysis.
Front Pharmacol
December 2024
2nd Internal Medicine Department, Sf. Spiridon Clinical Emergency Hospital, Iasi, Romania.
J Clin Neurosci
December 2024
Yale New Haven Hospital, Department of Pharmacy, New Haven, CT, United States; Sturdy Health, Population Health, Plainville, MA, United States. Electronic address:
Background And Purpose: Cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) requires acute anticoagulation. Heparin is commonly used but specific recommendations on intensity and timing are lacking. We sought to characterize practice-pattern variation in the use of unfractionated heparin (UFH) for acute CVT treatment across multiple centers.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFTrials
December 2024
Department of Cardiology, The Heart Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Background: Intermediate-high risk pulmonary embolism (PE) carries a significant risk of hemodynamic deterioration or death. Treatment should balance efficacy in reducing clot burden with the risk of complications, particularly bleeding. Previous studies on high-dose, short-term thrombolysis with alteplase (rtPA) showed a reduced risk of hemodynamic deterioration but no change in mortality and increased bleeding complications.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPerfusion
December 2024
Division of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Introduction: No clear guidelines exist for unfractionated heparin (UFH) monitoring in adult patients on veno-arterial extracorporeal life support (VA-ECLS) for refractory cardiogenic shock. In this study, we sought to compare outcomes between anti-factor Xa (FXa) and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) strategies for UFH monitoring during VA-ECLS.
Methods: This is a single-center, retrospective review of VA-ECLS patients who received UFH in the cardiothoracic intensive care unit between July 2019 and November 2023.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!