Optimal cutoff points for HOMA-IR and QUICKI in the diagnosis of metabolic syndrome and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: A population based study.

J Diabetes Complications

Gastroenterology and Liver Disease Research Center, Firoozgar Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Beh Afarin St., Karim Khan Zand Ave., 15900, Tehran, Iran. Electronic address:

Published: March 2016

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to identify the best cutoff points for HOMA-IR and QUICKI to diagnose metabolic syndrome (MetS) and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) using a cohort of 5,511 adults in northern Iran.
  • ROC analysis was performed to assess how effectively HOMA-IR and QUICKI could distinguish between individuals with and without MetS and NAFLD.
  • The results revealed that the optimal cutoff points varied by sex and condition; for example, HOMA-IR values for men were 2.0 for MetS and 1.79 for NAFLD, while for women, they were 2.5 and 1.95, respectively.

Article Abstract

Aims: The present study was carried out to determine the optimal cutoff points for homeostatic model assessment (HOMA-IR) and quantitative insulin sensitivity check index (QUICKI) in the diagnosis of metabolic syndrome (MetS) and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD).

Methods: The baseline data of 5511 subjects aged ≥18years of a cohort study in northern Iran were utilized to analyze. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was conducted to determine the discriminatory capability of HOMA-IR and QUICKI in the diagnosis of MetS and NAFLD. Youden index was utilized to determine the optimal cutoff points of HOMA-IR and QUICKI in the diagnosis of MetS and NAFLD.

Results: The optimal cutoff points for HOMA-IR in the diagnosis of MetS and NAFLD were 2.0 [sensitivity=64.4%, specificity=66.8%] and 1.79 [sensitivity=66.2%, specificity=62.2%] in men and were 2.5 [sensitivity=57.6%, specificity=67.9%] and 1.95 [sensitivity=65.1%, specificity=54.7%] in women respectively. Furthermore, the optimal cutoff points for QUICKI in the diagnosis of MetS and NAFLD were 0.343 [sensitivity=63.7%, specificity=67.8%] and 0.347 [sensitivity=62.9%, specificity=65.0%] in men and were 0.331 [sensitivity=55.7%, specificity=70.7%] and 0.333 [sensitivity=53.2%, specificity=67.7%] in women respectively.

Conclusion: Not only the optimal cutoff points of HOMA-IR and QUICKI were different for MetS and NAFLD, but also different cutoff points were obtained for men and women for each of these two conditions.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2015.11.019DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

cutoff points
28
optimal cutoff
24
quicki diagnosis
20
points homa-ir
16
homa-ir quicki
16
diagnosis mets
16
mets nafld
16
diagnosis metabolic
8
metabolic syndrome
8
non-alcoholic fatty
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!