A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Preoperative Embolization of Spinal Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. | LitMetric

Preoperative Embolization of Spinal Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

World Neurosurg

Neurosurgical Service, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Published: March 2016

Background: Spinal tumors are referred for preoperative embolization to minimize intraoperative blood loss and facilitate surgical resection.

Objective: To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis and provide comprehensive data on embolization technique, efficacy, and complications.

Methods: A systematic review of PubMed articles was performed with the following inclusion criteria: original studies, studies of ≥ 10 patients (except Onyx because of the scarcity of available data), embolization through vascular access, and reporting of the embolic agent used. In addition, the manuscript needed to contain at least 1 of the following variables: demographics, tumor type, location, vascularity, degree of devascularization, complications, time to operation, type of operation, estimated blood loss (EBL), and use of blood transfusion.

Results: Thirty-seven studies with a total of 1305 patients met inclusion criteria. Renal cell carcinoma was the most commonly embolized tumor, comprising 47.4% (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 39.4-55.4) of all tumor embolizations. The rate of complete devascularization for all tumor types was 68.3% (95% CI 60.0-76.6). There was a significant decrease in operative EBL in more recently published studies compared with earlier studies; however, the rate of complete embolization remained stable. Polyvinyl alcohol and Onyx were associated with similar EBL and rates of complete embolization. The overall complication rate was 3.1% (95% CI 1.2-4.9).

Conclusions: The rapid evolution of neurointervention and spinal tumor embolization has made scientific inquiry and definitive conclusion on the safety and efficacy of the practice difficult. The data supporting the procedure are fragmented and largely based on a multitude of retrospective studies that use varying techniques. Review of the available literature support embolization of spinal tumors as a safe and efficacious treatment adjunct before surgery.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2015.11.064DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

spinal tumors
12
systematic review
12
preoperative embolization
8
embolization spinal
8
review meta-analysis
8
blood loss
8
data embolization
8
inclusion criteria
8
rate complete
8
complete embolization
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!