Randomized Trial of a Web-Based Intervention to Address Barriers to Clinical Trials.

J Clin Oncol

Neal J. Meropol, University Hospitals Case Medical Center Seidman Cancer Center; Neal J. Meropol, Tyler G. Kinzy, Tasnuva M. Liu, Seunghee Margevicius, Dawn M. Miller, and Mark D. Schluchter, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University; Anne Lederman Flamm, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH; Yu-Ning Wong, Suzanne M. Miller, Michael Collins, Brian Egleston, and Eric Ross, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple University Health System; Joanne Buzaglo, Cancer Support Community Research and Training Institute; Linda Fleisher, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia; David Poole, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia, PA; Terrance Albrecht, Karmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI; Sharon Manne, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ; Al Bowen Benson III, Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; Michael Katz, International Myeloma Foundation, North Hollywood, CA; and Nancy Roach, Fight Colorectal Cancer, Alexandria, VA.

Published: February 2016

Purpose: Lack of knowledge and negative attitudes have been identified as barriers to participation in clinical trials by patients with cancer. We developed Preparatory Education About Clinical Trials (PRE-ACT), a theory-guided, Web-based, interactive computer program, to deliver tailored video educational content to patients in an effort to overcome barriers to considering clinical trials as a treatment option.

Patients And Methods: A prospective, randomized clinical trial compared PRE-ACT with a control condition that provided general clinical trials information produced by the National Cancer Institute (NCI) in text format. One thousand two hundred fifty-five patients with cancer were randomly allocated before their initial visit with an oncologist to PRE-ACT (n = 623) or control (n = 632). PRE-ACT had three main components: assessment of clinical trials knowledge and attitudinal barriers, values assessment with clarification back to patients, and provision of a video library tailored to address each patient's barriers. Outcomes included knowledge and attitudes and preparation for decision making about clinical trials.

Results: Both PRE-ACT and control interventions improved knowledge and attitudes (all P < .001) compared with baseline. Patients randomly allocated to PRE-ACT showed a significantly greater increase in knowledge (P < .001) and a significantly greater decrease in attitudinal barriers (P < .001) than did their control (text-only) counterparts. Participants in both arms significantly increased their preparedness to consider clinical trials (P < .001), and there was a trend favoring the PRE-ACT group (P < .09). PRE-ACT was also associated with greater patient satisfaction than was NCI text alone.

Conclusion: These data show that patient education before the first oncologist visit improves knowledge, attitudes, and preparation for decision making about clinical trials. Both text and tailored video were effective. The PRE-ACT interactive video program was more effective than NCI text in improving knowledge and reducing attitudinal barriers.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4872012PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2015.63.2257DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

clinical trials
32
nci text
12
attitudinal barriers
12
knowledge attitudes
12
clinical
10
pre-act
9
trials
8
patients cancer
8
tailored video
8
pre-act control
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!