AI Article Synopsis

  • A methodology was developed to derive backscattering cross sections of individual particles using the CytoSense flow cytometer, which detects light scatter and fluorescence.
  • The study involved determining weighting functions for the instrument's forward and sideward detectors and converting scattering measurements into numerical values for comparison with theoretical Mie computations.
  • A laboratory experiment confirmed the methodology by measuring backscattering cross sections of silica beads, showing 35% to 60% relative differences due to the different measurement parameters of the CytoSense and ECO-BB9 instruments.

Article Abstract

A methodology is developed to derive the backscattering cross section of individual particles as measured with the CytoSense (CytoBuoy b.v., NL). This in situ flow cytometer detects light scatter in forward and sideward directions and fluorescence in various spectral bands for a wide range of particles. First, the weighting functions are determined for the forward and sideward detectors to take into account their instrumental response as a function of the scattering angle. The CytoSense values are converted into forward and sideward scattering cross sections. The CytoSense estimates of uniform polystyrene microspheres from 1 to 90 μm are compared with Mie computations. The mean absolute relative differences ΔE are around 33.7% and 23.9% for forward and sideward scattering, respectively. Then, a theoretical relationship is developed to convert sideward scattering into backscattering cross section, from a synthetic database of 495,900 simulations including homogeneous and multi-layered spheres. The relationship follows a power law with a coefficient of determination of 0.95. To test the methodology, a laboratory experiment is carried out on a suspension of silica beads to compare backscattering cross section as measured by the WET Labs ECO-BB9 and derived from CytoSense. Relative differences are between 35% and 60%. They are of the same order of magnitude as the instrumental variability. Differences can be partly explained by the fact that the two instruments do not measure exactly the same parameter: the cross section of individual particles for the CytoSense and the bulk cross section for the ECO-BB9.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.23.031510DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

backscattering cross
16
forward sideward
16
cross individual
12
individual particles
12
sideward scattering
12
relative differences
8
cross
7
cytosense
5
sideward
5
determination backscattering
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!