Head-Eye Coordination at a Microscopic Scale.

Curr Biol

Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215, USA; Graduate Program in Neuroscience, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215, USA. Electronic address:

Published: December 2015

Humans explore static visual scenes by alternating rapid eye movements (saccades) with periods of slow and incessant eye drifts [1-3]. These drifts are commonly believed to be the consequence of physiological limits in maintaining steady gaze, resulting in Brownian-like trajectories [4-7], which are almost independent in the two eyes [8-10]. However, because of the technical difficulty of recording minute eye movements, most knowledge on ocular drift comes from artificial laboratory conditions, in which the head of the observer is strictly immobilized. Little is known about eye drift during natural head-free fixation, when microscopic head movements are also continually present [11-13]. We have recently observed that the power spectrum of the visual input to the retina during ocular drift is largely unaffected by fixational head movements [14]. Here we elucidate the mechanism responsible for this invariance. We show that, contrary to common assumption, ocular drift does not move the eyes randomly, but compensates for microscopic head movements, thereby yielding highly correlated movements in the two eyes. This compensatory behavior is extremely fast, persists with one eye patched, and results in image motion trajectories that are only partially correlated on the two retinas. These findings challenge established views of how humans acquire visual information. They show that ocular drift is precisely controlled, as long speculated [15], and imply the existence of neural mechanisms that integrate minute multimodal signals.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4733666PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2015.11.004DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

ocular drift
16
head movements
12
eye movements
8
microscopic head
8
movements
6
eye
5
drift
5
head-eye coordination
4
coordination microscopic
4
microscopic scale
4

Similar Publications

Manipulations of the strength of visual motion coherence have been widely used to study behavioral and neural mechanisms of visual motion processing. Here, we used a novel broadband visual stimulus to test how the strength of motion coherence in different spatial frequency (SF) bands impacts human ocular-following responses (OFRs). Synthesized broadband stimuli were used: a sum of one-dimensional vertical sine-wave gratings (SWs) whose SFs ranged from 0.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The foveated architecture of the human retina and the eye's mobility enables prime spatial vision, yet the interplay between photoreceptor cell topography and the constant motion of the eye during fixation remains unexplored. With in vivo foveal cone-resolved imaging and simultaneous microscopic photo stimulation, we examined visual acuity in both eyes of 16 participants while precisely recording the stimulus path on the retina. We find that resolution thresholds were correlated with the individual retina's sampling capacity, and exceeded what static sampling limits would predict by 18%, on average.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Oculomotor Contributions to Foveal Crowding.

J Neurosci

November 2024

Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York 14627

Crowding, the phenomenon of impaired visual discrimination due to nearby objects, has been extensively studied and linked to cortical mechanisms. Traditionally, crowding has been studied extrafoveally; its underlying mechanisms in the central fovea, where acuity is highest, remain debated. While low-level oculomotor factors are not thought to play a role in crowding, this study shows that they are key factors in defining foveal crowding.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • - The study investigates how fixational eye movements (FEMs) vary among children, adolescents, and adults under different viewing conditions (binocular and monocular).
  • - A total of 68 healthy participants were divided into three age groups and assessed for various metrics including fixation stability and saccade characteristics using a high-resolution video tracker.
  • - Results show that younger children demonstrate more fixation instability and larger saccade amplitudes compared to adults, but factors like inter-ocular fixation stability remain consistent across age groups, suggesting their utility in diagnosing conditions like amblyopia.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Our eyes constantly make quick movements called saccades and small adjustments known as fixational eye movements (FEMs), which help maintain clear vision rather than causing blurriness.
  • There’s a growing theory suggesting that our visual system relies on a space-to-time mechanism due to these eye movements, implying that FEMs are crucial for seeing clearly.
  • However, this theory conflicts with physiological evidence indicating that visual information relies mainly on the quick neural signals when our eyes fixate on a target, suggesting that these saccades are enough for normal perception without needing the FEMs.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!