Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
The reproducibility of Doppler ultrasound waveforms within gynecology has not been previously assessed. A study was conducted of Doppler ultrasound signals from the uterine and ovarian arteries in nonpregnant women. The aim of the study was to compare the results of two different observers and also to determine the influence of a time delay (30 minutes later). A second aim was to observe the influence of the menstrual cycle on Doppler ultrasound signals. Pulsatility indices were calculated for each series of Doppler signals. The results show that the technique has a large interobserver difference and its use in the deep pelvic vessels for research purposes is of doubtful value at present.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.7863/jum.1989.8.8.451 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!