A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Non-invasive exhaled volatile organic biomarker analysis to detect inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). | LitMetric

Introduction: Early inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) diagnosis remains a clinical challenge. Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) have shown distinct patterns in Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). VOC production, reflecting gut fermentome metabolites, is perturbed in IBD. VOC sampling is non-invasive, with various compounds identified from faecal, breath and urine samples. This study aimed to determine if FAIMS (field asymmetric ion mobility spectroscopy) analysis of exhaled VOCs could distinguish IBD from controls.

Methods: Seventy-six subjects were recruited, 54 established IBD (25 CD, 29 UC) and 22 healthy controls. End expiratory breath was captured using a Warwick device and analysed by FAIMS. Data were pre-processed using wavelet transformation, and classification performed in a 10-fold cross-validation. Feature selection was performed using Wilcoxon rank sum test, and sparse logistic regression gave class predictions, to calculate sensitivity and specificity.

Results: FAIMS breath VOC analysis showed clear separation of IBD from controls, sensitivity: 0.74 (0.65-0.82), specificity: 0.75 (0.53-0.90), AUROC: 0.82 (0.74-0.89), p-value 6.2×10(-7). IBD subgroup analysis distinguished UC from CD: sensitivity of 0.67 (0.54-0.79), specificity: 0.67 (0.54-0.79), AUROC: 0.70 (0.60-0.80), p-value 9.23×10(-4).

Conclusion: This confirms the utility of exhaled VOC analysis to distinguish IBD from healthy controls, and UC from CD. It conforms to other studies using different technology, whilst affirming exhaled VOCs as biomarkers for diagnosing IBD.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dld.2015.10.013DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

ibd
9
volatile organic
8
inflammatory bowel
8
bowel disease
8
disease ibd
8
exhaled vocs
8
distinguish ibd
8
ibd healthy
8
healthy controls
8
voc analysis
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!