Detailed characterization of familial idiopathic ventricular fibrillation linked to the DPP6 locus.

Background: Familial idiopathic ventricular fibrillation (IVF) is a severe disease entity and is notoriously difficult to manage because there are no clinical risk indicators for premature cardiac arrest. Previously, we identified a link between familial IVF and a risk haplotype on chromosome 7q36 (involving the arrhythmia gene DPP6).

Objective: The purpose of this study was to expand our knowledge of familial IVF and to discuss its (extended) clinical characteristics.

Methods: We studied 601 family members and probands: 286 DPP6 risk-haplotype positive (haplotype-positive) and 315 DPP6 risk-haplotype negative (haplotype-negative) individuals. Clinical parameters, a combination of all-cause mortality and (aborted) cardiac arrest and differences between haplotype-positives and haplotype-negatives, were evaluated.

Results: There were no differences in electrocardiographic indices between haplotype-positives and haplotype-negatives, or between haplotype-positives with or without events. Cardiac magnetic resonance documented slightly larger ventricular volumes in haplotype-positives compared to controls (P <.05), but these were not clinically useful. Mortality and/or cardiac arrest occurred in 85 haplotype-positives (30%) and 18 haplotype-negatives (6%). Twenty-four haplotype-positives (8% male) were resuscitated from ventricular fibrillation (VF). Documented VF was always elicited by monomorphic short-coupled extrasystoles from the right ventricular apex/lower free wall. Median survival in risk-haplotype haplotype-positives was 70 vs. 93 years for haplotype-negatives (P < .01), with a worse phenotype in males (median survival 63 vs. 83 years in females, P < .01). Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators were implanted in 99 patients (76 [77%] for primary prevention). Two arrhythmic events occurred in the primary prevention group during follow-up (5 ± 3 years).

Conclusion: Despite our extensive analysis, the complexity in identifying asymptomatic IVF family members at risk for future arrhythmias based on clinical parameters is once more demonstrated.