Introduction: Multiple rounds of centrifugation or washing spermatozoa can cause sperm DNA fragmentation (SDF); however, a microfluidic approach to select spermatozoa does not require centrifugation. Reports have suggested that sperm sorting using a microfluidic device is an effective method to select good quality spermatozoa, however, it is not known whether it reduces sperm DNA damage. We investigated whether the frequency of SDF was affected by selection method during sperm processing.

Materials And Methods: Semen samples from ten men with normal, oligozoospermia and asthenozoospermia were split into two groups and sorted using a microfluidic device or by a swim-up method. Subsequently, semen parameters and SDF were measured and analyzed using paired or non-paired Student's t-tests.

Results: For samples sorted by the microfluidic device (Sperm Sorter Qualis(®); Menicon, Kasugai, Japan) or the swim-up method, both showed a decrease in SDF. However, the decrease was more significant when the microfluidic device was used.

Conclusion: Sorting using the microfluidic device resulted in less SDF than did the swim-up method.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4668478PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2015/10332.6811DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

microfluidic device
24
sperm dna
12
swim-up method
12
dna fragmentation
8
selection method
8
device swim-up
8
sorting microfluidic
8
sorted microfluidic
8
microfluidic
7
method
6

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!