A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@remsenmedia.com&api_key=81853a771c3a3a2c6b2553a65bc33b056f08&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Comparison of three different techniques of human sperm DNA isolation for methylation assay. | LitMetric

Comparison of three different techniques of human sperm DNA isolation for methylation assay.

J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci

Center of Reproductive Medicine, Institute of Family Planning Research, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, China.

Published: December 2015

AI Article Synopsis

  • Human sperm DNA has a unique chromatin structure that requires specialized extraction methods compared to somatic cells.
  • The study compared three sperm DNA extraction techniques: modified guanidinium thiocyanate method (method A), phenol-chloroform method (method B), and TianGen kit method (method C).
  • Results showed that method A produced the highest quantity and purity of DNA and was more reliable for amplifying certain genes, making it the preferred choice for sperm DNA extraction, especially for methylation assays.

Article Abstract

Human sperm DNA is an important genetic and epigenetic material, whose chromatin structure differs from that of somatic cells. As such, conventional methods for DNA extraction of somatic cells may not be suitable for obtaining sperm DNA. In this study, we evaluated and compared three sperm DNA extraction techniques, namely, modified guanidinium thiocyanate method (method A), traditional phenol-chloroform method (method B), and TianGen kit method (method C). Spectrophotometry and agarose gel electrophoresis analyses showed that method A produced DNA with higher quantity and purity than those of methods B and C (P<0.01). PCR results revealed that method A was more reliable in amplifying DEAD-box polypeptide 4 (DDX4) and copy number variations (CNVs) than methods B and C, which generated false-positive errors. The results of sperm DNA methylation assay further indicated that methods A and B were effective, and the former yielded higher quantitative accuracy. In conclusion, the modified guanidinium thiocyanate method provided high quality and reliable results and could be an optimal technique for extracting sperm DNA for methylation assay.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11596-015-1532-0DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

sperm dna
16
method method
12
human sperm
8
somatic cells
8
dna extraction
8
method
7
dna
6
comparison three
4
three techniques
4
techniques human
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!