Background/aims: To validate the AIMS65 score for predicting mortality of patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding and to evaluate the effectiveness of urgent (<8 hours) endoscopic procedures in patients with high AIMS65 scores.
Methods: This was a 5-year single-center, retrospective study. Nonvariceal, upper gastrointestinal bleeding was assessed by using the AIM65 and Rockall scores. Scores for mortality were assessed by calculating the area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUROC). Patients with high AIMS65 scores (≥2) were allocated to either the urgent or non-urgent endoscopic procedure group. In-hospital mortality, success of endoscopic procedure, recurrence of bleeding, admission period, and dose of transfusion were compared between groups.
Results: A total of 634 patients were analyzed. The AIMS65 score successfully predicted mortality (AUROC=0.943; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.876 to 0.99) and was superior to the Rockall score (AUROC=0.856; 95% CI, 0.743 to 0.969) in predicting mortality. The group with high AIMS65 score included 200 patients. The urgent endoscopic procedure group had reduced hospitalization periods (p<0.05).
Conclusions: AIMS65 score may be useful in predicting mortality in patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Urgent endoscopic procedures in patients with high scores may be related to reduced hospitalization periods.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4676659 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.5946/ce.2015.48.6.522 | DOI Listing |
Medicine (Baltimore)
November 2024
Department of Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) is a critical emergency. Conventional scoring models for patients with UGIB have limitations; thus, more suitable tools for the Emergency Department are necessary. We aimed to develop a new model that can identify significant predictors of Intensive Care Unit (ICU) admission in Emergency Department patients with UGIB and to compare its predictive accuracy with that of existing models.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCureus
November 2024
Population Health, Johns Hopkins Aramco Healthcare, Dhahran, SAU.
Introduction Upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) is a common medical emergency that causes significant deaths and morbidity. Effective risk classification is crucial for clinical decision-making and resource allocation. Several risk assessments, including the Glasgow-Blatchford score (GBS), AIMS65, National Early Warning Score (NEWS), and National Early Warning Score + Lactate (NEWS+L), are widely used, but each has unique strengths and disadvantages.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFHeliyon
September 2024
Department of Emergency Medicine, College of Medicine, Catholic Kwandong University College of Medicine, International St. Mary's Hospital, Incheon Metropolitan City, Republic of Korea.
Sci Rep
August 2024
Liver Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy.
Upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) is a common cause of hospital admission worldwide and several risk scores have been developed to predict clinically relevant outcomes. Despite the geriatric population being a high-risk group, age is often overlooked in the assessment of many risk scores. In this study we aimed to compare the predictive accuracy of six pre-endoscopic risk scoring systems in a geriatric population hospitalised with UGIB.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFIntern Emerg Med
July 2024
Department of Emergency Medicine, Chung-Ang University Gwangmyeong Hospital, College of Medicine, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, 110, Deokan-Ro, Gwangmyeong-Si, Gyeonggi-Do, Republic of Korea.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!