Continuous Combined Estrogen Plus Progestin and Endometrial Cancer: The Women's Health Initiative Randomized Trial.

J Natl Cancer Inst

Affiliations of authors: Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA (RTC); Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Division of Public Health Sciences, Seattle, WA (GLA, AKA, CC ); Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA (GES, SDR); Department of Research and Evaluation, Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Pasadena, CA (RH); Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine Florida International University, Miami, FL (CDR); Department of Nutritional Sciences and Arizona Cancer Center, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ (CAT); Star Research Institute / Howard University, Washington, DC (BVH); Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, State University of New York, Memphis, TN (JWW); Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY (TER); Karmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI (MSS); Brigham and Women's Health Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (JEM).

Published: March 2016

Background: While progestin addition to estrogen mitigates endometrial cancer risk, the magnitude of the effect on incidence, specific endometrial cancer histologies, and endometrial cancer mortality remains unsettled. These issues were assessed by analyses after extended follow-up of the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) randomized clinical trial evaluating continuous combined estrogen plus progestin use.

Methods: The WHI enrolled 16 608 postmenopausal women into a randomly assigned, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Women age 50 to 79 years with intact uteri with normal endometrial biopsy at entry were randomly assigned to once-daily 0.625 mg conjugated equine estrogen plus 2.5mg medroxyprogesterone acetate (n = 8506) as a single pill or matching placebo (n = 8102). Follow-up beyond the original trial completion date required reconsent, obtained from 12 788 (83%) of surviving participants. Analyses were by intent-to-treat. All statistical tests were two-sided.

Results: After 5.6 years' median intervention and 13 years' median cumulative follow-up, there were fewer endometrial cancers in the combined hormone therapy compared with the placebo group (66 vs 95 case patients, yearly incidence, 0.06% vs 0.10%; hazard ratio [HR] = 0.65, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.48 to 0.89, P = .007). While there were somewhat fewer endometrial cancers during intervention (25 vs 30, respectively; HR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.45 to 1.31), the difference became statistically significant postintervention (41 vs 65, respectively; HR = 0.59, 95% CI = 0.40 to 0.88, P = .008), but hazard ratios did not differ between phases (P difference = .46). There was a statistically nonsignificant reduction in deaths from endometrial cancer in the estrogen plus progestin group (5 vs 11 deaths, HR = 0.42, 95% CI = 0.15 to 1.22).

Conclusion: In postmenopausal women, continuous combined estrogen plus progestin decreases endometrial cancer incidence.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5072373PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djv350DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

endometrial cancer
24
estrogen progestin
16
continuous combined
12
combined estrogen
12
endometrial
9
women's health
8
health initiative
8
postmenopausal women
8
randomly assigned
8
years' median
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!