A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Efficacy of Optimal Recording Electrode Placement for Median-Lumbrical and Ulnar-Interossei/Lumbrical Distal Latency in the Diagnosis of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome. | LitMetric

Efficacy of Optimal Recording Electrode Placement for Median-Lumbrical and Ulnar-Interossei/Lumbrical Distal Latency in the Diagnosis of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome.

J Clin Neurophysiol

*Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University, Seoul, Korea; and †Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Korea University College of Medicine, Seongnam-si, Korea.

Published: April 2016

Purpose: This study is to determine the diagnostic utility of optimal recording electrode placement for distal latency comparison of median-second lumbrical and ulnar-interossei/third lumbrical (M2L-UI3L) in carpal tunnel syndrome.

Methods: Sixty-five hands of control and 75 hands of 62 clinically suspected carpal tunnel syndromes were used for the M2L-UI3L and standard conduction studies. To obtain optimal M2L-UI3L, the recording active electrode (E1) was placed at the midpalm over the third metacarpal bone, whereas the reference electrode (E2) was attached to the palmar digital crease area. Then, median and ulnar nerves were stimulated on the wrist each at 8 cm proximal to E1. M2L-UI3L and standard nerve conduction studies were performed. Sensitivity and specificity of M2L-UI3L were measured in the diagnosis of mild carpal tunnel syndrome.

Results: For statistical analysis, the receiver operating characteristics and Student t-test were used. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of M2L-UI3L was 0.993. Diagnostic cutoff value of M2L-UI3L greater than 0.6 milliseconds yields sensitivity of 93% and specificity of 97%. The distal median motor latency to the second lumbrical alone showed the area under the curve of 0.998, and the diagnostic cutoff value greater than 3.4 milliseconds yields sensitivity of 96% and specificity of 100%.

Conclusions: This technique for M2L-UI3L shows high sensitivity and specificity compared with the previous reports on the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. Furthermore, the values of median-second lumbrical motor latency alone have higher sensitivity and specificity, comparable with the median sensory conduction study across the wrist segment.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/WNP.0000000000000242DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

carpal tunnel
20
sensitivity specificity
12
optimal recording
8
recording electrode
8
electrode placement
8
distal latency
8
diagnosis carpal
8
tunnel syndrome
8
median-second lumbrical
8
m2l-ui3l
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!