Effective Fluoride Mouthwash Delivery Methods as an Alternative to Rinsing.

Nurs Res

Chayanit Rattanawiboon, DDS, is Research Associate; Chayanit Chaweewannakorn, DDS, is Research Associate; and Tanyamai Saisakphong, DDS, is Research Associate, Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand. Kasekarn Kasevayuth, PhD, is Lecturer, Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand. Chutima Trairatvorakul, M.S., is Associate Professor, Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.

Published: April 2016

AI Article Synopsis

  • Special-needs patients at high risk for cavities struggle with traditional fluoride mouth rinse due to compliance issues and lack of home-use guidance.
  • This study tested two new delivery methods (spray and swab) for fluoride to see if they could achieve salivary fluoride levels similar to those from standard rinsing.
  • Results showed that both spray and cotton swab methods effectively raised salivary fluoride levels comparably to rinsing, suggesting these alternatives are viable for patients who cannot rinse properly.

Article Abstract

Background: Special-needs patients with high caries risk cannot benefit from the proven caries-reducing effect of fluoride mouthrinse because of poor rinsing compliance and a lack of home-use fluoride application recommendations.

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate whether two modified delivery methods-spray or swab application-could raise the salivary fluoride to levels similar to that of rinsing.

Methods: Five healthy men and 16 healthy women, ages 18-22 years, participated in this crossover study. The subjects performed a standardized brushing routine twice a day with 1,000-ppm fluoride dentifrice 1 week before and during the experimental period. The three fluoride mouthwash (0.05% NaF; 226-ppm fluoride) administration methods consisted of rinsing, spray, and cotton swab application. Each application was separated by at least 1 week. Unstimulated whole saliva was sampled for 2 minutes at baseline and at 0, 5, 10, 20, 30, 60, and 120 minutes after each fluoride mouthwash application. Salivary fluoride level (ppm) was measured by a blinded investigator using an ion-specific electrode (ORION EA940). The differences in salivary fluoride concentration for each application method were analyzed by repeated measures ANOVA at a nominal significance level of .05.

Results: The newly designed fluoride mouthwash delivery methods yielded a similar fluoride level in whole saliva compared to that of rinsing at all time points (p > .05). The t half-life of fluoride concentration ranged from 1.62 minutes (SD = 0.53) in the spray group to 2.08 minutes (SD = 0.87) in the cotton swab group; the values were not significantly different.

Discussion: Our results indicate that the spray and cotton swab fluoride delivery methods were effective alternatives to conventional mouth rinsing. Caregivers of individuals with acute and chronic illness, including developmental disabilities affecting cognitive or physical abilities, may consider using these alternative fluoride delivery methods to help promote dental hygiene.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/NNR.0000000000000131DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

fluoride mouthwash
16
delivery methods
16
fluoride
14
salivary fluoride
12
cotton swab
12
mouthwash delivery
8
spray cotton
8
fluoride level
8
fluoride concentration
8
fluoride delivery
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!