Head movements of workers were measured in the sagittal plane in order to establish a precise and accurate assessment method to be used in real work situations. Measurements were performed using two inclinometers connected to an embedded recording system. Two quantitative analysis methods were tested, i.e., measurement of bending with an inclinometer attached to the head, and measurement of flexion/extension by using an additional inclinometer located at C7/T1. The results were also compared with a video observation method (qualitative). The results showed that bending measurements were significantly different from those of flexion/extension for angles between 0° and 20°, and angles >45°. There were also significant differences between workers for flexion >45°, reflecting individual variability. Additionally, several limitations of observational methods were revealed by this study.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2015.1081772DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

comparison neck
4
neck bending
4
bending flexion
4
flexion measurement
4
measurement methods
4
methods assessment
4
assessment ergonomic
4
ergonomic risk
4
risk head
4
head movements
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!