A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

What is the most appropriate intraoperative baseline parathormone? A prospective cohort study. | LitMetric

What is the most appropriate intraoperative baseline parathormone? A prospective cohort study.

Int J Surg

Head and Neck Surgical Oncology, Cancer Care Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada. Electronic address:

Published: January 2016

Introduction: The time of drawing pre-incision intraoperative parathyroid hormone (ioPTH) is crucial to provide the right baseline for post-excision PTH measurement. The objective of this study was to identify the optimal time and the numbers of baseline PTH samples that best predict excision of all hypercellular parathyroid tissue when compared with 10-min post-excision PTH level.

Materials And Methods: In this prospective study, two pre-incision (pre-induction and 10-min post-induction) baseline ioPTH samples along with pre- and post-excision ioPTH were collected and analyzed for 352 parathyroidectomies in 341 patients for sporadic primary hyperparathyroidism at a University hospital. Paired Wilcoxan signed rank test was used to compare the pre-incision ioPTH levels and their percent drop to 10-min post-excision levels. Sensitivity, specificity, predictive values and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to compare the predictability of the two pre-incision levels.

Results: The difference between pre- and post-induction baseline PTH levels was highly significant (p < 0.001). In 4% cases the criterion of post-excision PTH drop of ≥50% was achieved only with the post-induction baseline PTH and not with pre-induction PTH measurement. Using pre-induction baseline, ioPTH had an overall accuracy of 90% whereas ≥50% fall in the post-excision PTH from the post-induction baseline PTH had the accuracy of 94.85%.

Discussion: There was a significant difference between pre- and post-induction PTH levels and Miami criteria was met in 95.45% cases with post-induction baseline.

Conclusions: The optimal time for drawing pre-incision baseline PTH sample is at 10 min post-induction of general anesthesia and positioning of patient.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.11.044DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

baseline pth
8
baseline
5
appropriate intraoperative
4
intraoperative baseline
4
baseline parathormone?
4
parathormone? prospective
4
prospective cohort
4
cohort study
4
study introduction
4
introduction time
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!