Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Introduction: The time of drawing pre-incision intraoperative parathyroid hormone (ioPTH) is crucial to provide the right baseline for post-excision PTH measurement. The objective of this study was to identify the optimal time and the numbers of baseline PTH samples that best predict excision of all hypercellular parathyroid tissue when compared with 10-min post-excision PTH level.
Materials And Methods: In this prospective study, two pre-incision (pre-induction and 10-min post-induction) baseline ioPTH samples along with pre- and post-excision ioPTH were collected and analyzed for 352 parathyroidectomies in 341 patients for sporadic primary hyperparathyroidism at a University hospital. Paired Wilcoxan signed rank test was used to compare the pre-incision ioPTH levels and their percent drop to 10-min post-excision levels. Sensitivity, specificity, predictive values and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to compare the predictability of the two pre-incision levels.
Results: The difference between pre- and post-induction baseline PTH levels was highly significant (p < 0.001). In 4% cases the criterion of post-excision PTH drop of ≥50% was achieved only with the post-induction baseline PTH and not with pre-induction PTH measurement. Using pre-induction baseline, ioPTH had an overall accuracy of 90% whereas ≥50% fall in the post-excision PTH from the post-induction baseline PTH had the accuracy of 94.85%.
Discussion: There was a significant difference between pre- and post-induction PTH levels and Miami criteria was met in 95.45% cases with post-induction baseline.
Conclusions: The optimal time for drawing pre-incision baseline PTH sample is at 10 min post-induction of general anesthesia and positioning of patient.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.11.044 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!