Hazardous chemical, radiological, and nuclear materials threaten public health in scenarios of accidental or intentional release which can lead to external contamination of people.  Without intervention, the contamination could cause severe adverse health effects, through systemic absorption by the contaminated casualties as well as spread of contamination to other people, medical equipment, and facilities.  Timely decontamination can prevent or interrupt absorption into the body and minimize opportunities for spread of the contamination, thereby mitigating the health impact of the incident.  Although the specific physicochemical characteristics of the hazardous material(s) will determine the nature of an incident and its risks, some decontamination and medical challenges and recommended response strategies are common among chemical and radioactive material incidents.  Furthermore, the identity of the hazardous material released may not be known early in an incident.  Therefore, it may be beneficial to compare the evidence and harmonize approaches between chemical and radioactive contamination incidents.  Experts from the Global Health Security Initiative's Chemical and Radiological/Nuclear Working Groups present here a succinct summary of guiding principles for planning and response based on current best practices, as well as research needs, to address the challenges of managing contaminated casualties in a chemical or radiological/nuclear incident.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4648544PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/currents.dis.9489f4c319d9105dd0f1435ca182eaa9DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

chemical radiological/nuclear
12
radiological/nuclear incident
8
external contamination
8
guiding principles
8
contaminated casualties
8
spread contamination
8
chemical radioactive
8
chemical
6
contamination
6
mass casualty
4

Similar Publications

Introduction: Civilian healthcare workers (HCW) and medical facilities are directly and indirectly impacted by armed conflict. In the Russia-Ukraine war, acute trauma care needs grew, the workforce was destabilised by HCW migrating or shifting roles to meet conflict needs, and facilities faced surge events. Chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear and explosive (CBRNE) exposure risks created unique preparedness needs.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear, and explosive (CBRNE) incidents present rare and complex challenges for Emergency Medical Services (EMS), necessitating effective incident command to manage occupational and patient safety risks. EMS incident commanders must make quick decisions under pressure, coordinating medical responses and ensuring personnel's safety. This study examined the perceived competence requirements of Finnish EMS field supervisors in managing C and E incidents.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background/objectives: This study develops machine learning (ML) models to predict hypoxemia severity during emergency triage, particularly in Chemical, Biological, Radiological, Nuclear, and Explosive (CBRNE) scenarios, using physiological data from medical-grade sensors.

Methods: Tree-based models (TBMs) such as XGBoost, LightGBM, CatBoost, Random Forests (RFs), Voting Classifier ensembles, and sequential models (LSTM, GRU) were trained on the MIMIC-III and IV datasets. A preprocessing pipeline addressed missing data, class imbalances, and synthetic data flagged with masks.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

The Importance of Biosecurity in Emerging Biotechnologies and Synthetic Biology.

Avicenna J Med Biotechnol

January 2024

Department of Biotechnology Engineering, Faculty of Medical Engineering, Shahab Danesh University, Qom, Iran.

The age of synthetic biology is ushering in new technologies for the advancement of society, human health, and agriculture. It appears that synthetic biology has integrated engineering paradigms into biological contexts. The combined use of new biotechnology and synthetic biology raises concerns about biosafety, biosecurity, and even cyberbiosecurity.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • * A study was conducted using serological tests to evaluate the health of these first responders, comparing two types of tests: a lateral flow immunoassay (LFIA) and an automated laboratory immunoassay.
  • * The study found a significant agreement (Cohen's kappa of 0.78) between the two test methods, and both tests exhibited high sensitivity at 97%.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!