Background: The red cell distribution width (RDW) has also been reported to reliably reflect the inflammation and nutrition status and predict the prognosis across several types of cancer, however, the prognostic value of RDW in esophageal carcinoma has seldom been studied.
Methods: A retrospective study was performed to assess the prognostic value of RDW in patients with esophageal carcinoma by the Kaplan-Meier analysis and multivariate Cox regression proportional hazard model. All enrolled patients were divided into high RDW group (≧15%) and low RDW group (<15%) according to the detected RDW values.
Results: Clinical and laboratory data from a total of 179 patients with esophageal carcinoma were retrieved. With a median follow-up of 21months, the high RDW group exhibited a shorter disease-free survival (DFS) (p<0.001) and an unfavorable overall survival (OS) (p<0.001) in the univariate analysis. The multivariate analysis revealed that elevated RDW at diagnosis was an independent prognostic factor for shorter PFS (p=0.043, HR=1.907, 95% CI=1.020-3.565) and poor OS (p=0.042, HR=1.895, 95% CI=1.023-3.508) after adjustment with other cancer-related prognostic factors.
Conclusion: The present study suggests that elevated preoperative RDW(≧15%) at the diagnosis may independently predict poorer disease-free and overall survival among patients with esophageal carcinoma.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2015.11.025 | DOI Listing |
J Clin Med
December 2024
Allergology Department, "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania.
is a topoisomerase I inhibitor used for the treatment of various cancers, such as gastrointestinal, pancreatic, pulmonary, ovarian, and cervical cancers. Among chemotherapy agents, it represents a rare trigger of drug hypersensitivity reactions, with few cases being reported until today. We present the case of a patient with metastatic esophageal cancer and a history of -induced grade IV (WAO classification) anaphylaxis.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFDiagnostics (Basel)
December 2024
Department of Gastroenterology, Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Diseases Center, Komagome Hospital, 3-18-22 Honkomagome, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo 113-8677, Japan.
Background/objectives: Superficial esophageal cancer is diagnosed by evaluating the vascular architecture, including dilation, tortuosity, caliber change, and shape, of a lesion. However, this diagnosis is subjective and requires extensive experience. Endoscopically distinguishing squamous intraepithelial neoplasia (SIN) from esophageal cancer is difficult.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEur J Surg Oncol
January 2025
Department of Radiation Oncology, The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, 050011, Hebei, China. Electronic address:
Eur J Surg Oncol
December 2024
Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland - Medical University of Bahrain, Manama, Bahrain; Academic Department of Surgery, Connolly Hospital Blanchardstown, Dublin, Ireland; Department of Surgery, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Background: There is currently no consensus on the role, method or frequency of surveillance following curative treatment of oesophageal cancer; re-investigation largely relying on symptom triggers which may delay detection of recurrence and impact survival. We hypothesised that intensive surveillance with endoscopy and imaging was more likely to detect recurrent or new cancer at a curable stage and this study examined the outcomes of this surveillance policy.
Patients And Methods: A prospective database of curatively treated oesophageal carcinoma patients was interrogated for patients with new or recurrent disease detected on surveillance and amenable to salvage surgery.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!